Skip to content

Conversation

@marceloneppel
Copy link
Member

@marceloneppel marceloneppel commented Nov 27, 2025

Issue

We added some workaround in #1154 to make the CI work while we waited for a fix in Juju secrets (which landed in Juju 3.6.12).

Solution

Remove the workaround (with Juju 3.6.12, it's possible to again deploy the charm in the same model with the same name).

Checklist

  • I have added or updated any relevant documentation.
  • I have cleaned any remaining cloud resources from my accounts.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Henrique Neppel <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Libraries: Out of sync The charm libs used are out-of-sync label Nov 27, 2025
@marceloneppel marceloneppel added the bug Something isn't working as expected label Nov 27, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.80%. Comparing base (20abada) to head (20c2d28).

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (65.80%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           16/edge    #1165   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    65.80%   65.80%           
========================================
  Files           18       18           
  Lines         4068     4068           
  Branches       600      600           
========================================
  Hits          2677     2677           
  Misses        1189     1189           
  Partials       202      202           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@marceloneppel marceloneppel changed the base branch from 16/edge to fix-refresh-check November 27, 2025 20:34
@marceloneppel marceloneppel marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2025 20:07
@marceloneppel marceloneppel requested review from a team, dragomirp, onkolahmet and taurus-forever and removed request for a team November 28, 2025 20:07
Base automatically changed from fix-refresh-check to 16/edge December 1, 2025 15:33
@github-actions github-actions bot added Libraries: OK The charm libs used are OK and in-sync and removed Libraries: Out of sync The charm libs used are out-of-sync labels Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working as expected Libraries: OK The charm libs used are OK and in-sync

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants