Skip to content

Conversation

@justindbaur
Copy link
Member

@justindbaur justindbaur commented Jan 8, 2026

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

This makes it a warning (which is upgraded to error by default) to not specify a CultureInfo or IFormatProvider when there is an overload that takes them. The default of .NET is to use the current culture but that can cause differences for people who have a different culture on their computer. Likely most of these warnings should have CultureInfo.InvariantCulture specified but that is a difference for what is happening today so a decision has to be made that it is correct for each place.

This helps make things like #6811 less likely to happen.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsc477279d-69f3-4384-aaed-388bf7339d6d

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.02%. Comparing base (6d69c9b) to head (3561573).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6813      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.07%   59.02%   +3.95%     
==========================================
  Files        1934     1934              
  Lines       85777    85777              
  Branches     7675     7675              
==========================================
+ Hits        47238    50634    +3396     
+ Misses      36749    33269    -3480     
- Partials     1790     1874      +84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@withinfocus withinfocus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lot of whitespace differences I had to temporarily disable, not sure we want those.

@justindbaur
Copy link
Member Author

@withinfocus The Directory.Build.props one is relatively normal, our version bumping script leaves that file technically against our preferred formatting so if you edit that file in an IDE you'll get those.

The Scim integration test project is because it had CRLF line endings instead of LF defined by our editorconfig so VSCode updated it. I can change it back and update it separately if that is preferred though.

Copy link
Contributor

@AmyLGalles AmyLGalles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@sbrown-livefront sbrown-livefront left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants