[PM-27884][PM-27886][PM-27885] - Add Cipher Archives

[jaasen-livefront]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-27884
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-27885
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-27886

📔 Objective

This is the first step in the process of migrating the cipher archiveDate to use the Cipher.Archives data column

Key Changes

• Added sql and migration scripts to create the column

Updated the following:

• Cipher Repository
• Archive Ciphers Command
• Unarchive Ciphers Command
• CipherDetailsQuery

Notes

• No behavior changes yet; archive logic still uses Cipher.ArchivedDate.

Testing Notes

Testing was done with archiving/unarchiving via the web client without issue.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 54e9d323-cf9d-43ae-903e-8f81f242779e

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 54.54545% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.97%. Comparing base (a6e034a) to head (b38ac70).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/Api/Vault/Controllers/CiphersController.cs	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
...tyFramework/Vault/Repositories/CipherRepository.cs	73.91%	3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...ork/Repositories/Queries/UserCipherDetailsQuery.cs	76.47%	3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/Core/Vault/Commands/ArchiveCiphersCommand.cs	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/Core/Vault/Commands/UnarchiveCiphersCommand.cs	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/Core/Vault/Models/Data/CipherDetails.cs	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6578      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.04%   58.97%   +3.93%     
==========================================
  Files        1934     1934              
  Lines       85581    85638      +57     
  Branches     7656     7660       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        47106    50508    +3402     
+ Misses      36686    33258    -3428     
- Partials     1789     1872      +83     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[withinfocus]

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EN/pages/2130739201/Vault+Technical+Breakdown+Archive+For+Premium+Database+Revamp?focusedCommentId=2168389739 -- needs discussion please.

[jaasen-livefront]

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EN/pages/2130739201/Vault+Technical+Breakdown+Archive+For+Premium+Database+Revamp?focusedCommentId=2168389739 -- needs discussion please.

@withinfocus I've reached out to the vault team regarding your comment!

[nick-livefront]

Nothing jumps out to me, feels like claude has given some good feedback!

I agree with missing tests here but integration tests feel like they will be coming downstream with the follow up work

[jaasen-livefront]

@jrmccannon Sorry just need one last approval. Ty!

Review Not required

[rkac-bw]

LGTM