Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 18, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
napi-derive dependencies major 2 -> 3

Release Notes

napi-rs/napi-rs (napi-derive)

v3.2.5

Compare Source

Other
  • updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

v3.2.4

Compare Source

Other
  • (napi) extends the Set types interoperability (#​2875)

v3.2.3

Compare Source

Fixed
  • (napi) link issue on cargo test --features noop (#​2872)
  • (deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.5.0 (#​2865)

v3.2.2

Compare Source

Fixed
  • (napi) no need to cleanup thread_local stuff (#​2851)

v3.2.1

Compare Source

Fixed
  • (napi) ensure tokio runtime is initialized for dlopen (#​2850)
  • (napi) handle the return_if_invalid for Array param (#​2846)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

Added
  • (napi) add ScopeGenerator trait (#​2831)
  • make generator an iterator (#​2784)
  • (napi) add Error.cause support to napi::Error (#​2829)
Fixed
  • (napi) user_defined_rt can only be used once (#​2841)

v3.1.2

Compare Source

Other
  • (napi) use Vec with_capacity in FromNapiValue (#​2793)

v3.1.1

Compare Source

Other
  • Revert "fix(napi): callback should be Fn rather than FnOnce" (#​2791)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

Added
  • (napi) provide ScopedTask to resolve JsValue with lifetime (#​2786)
Other
  • (napi) add UnwindSafe and RefUnwindSafe back to AbortSignal and AsyncWorkPromise (#​2789)
  • pin release-plz action

v3.0.0

Compare Source

NAPI-RS v3

https://napi.rs/blog/announce-v3


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 2nd week starting on the 2 week of the year before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Aug 18, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path crates/bitwarden-napi/Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 3.2.5
error: failed to acquire package cache lock

Caused by:
  failed to open: /home/ubuntu/.cargo/.package-cache

Caused by:
  failed to create directory `/home/ubuntu/.cargo`

Caused by:
  File exists (os error 17)

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 03:23
@bitwarden-bot bitwarden-bot changed the title [deps]: Update Rust crate napi-derive to v3 [SM-1554] [deps]: Update Rust crate napi-derive to v3 Aug 18, 2025
@bitwarden-bot
Copy link

Internal tracking:

@renovate renovate bot changed the title [SM-1554] [deps]: Update Rust crate napi-derive to v3 [deps]: Update Rust crate napi-derive to v3 Aug 18, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/napi-derive-3.x branch 2 times, most recently from 3a6e18e to c320303 Compare August 23, 2025 10:38
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/napi-derive-3.x branch from c320303 to 7b970b1 Compare September 15, 2025 07:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/napi-derive-3.x branch from 7b970b1 to f24f43b Compare September 25, 2025 18:03
@vincentsalucci
Copy link
Member

New Jira tracking task: https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/SM-1709

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants