[PM-27050] Fix : Cannot upload self-hosted license on new Premium page

[cyprain-okeke]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-27050

📔 Objective

The newly implemented PremiumVNextComponent does not maintain the original, Self-Hosted version of the component
In Self-Host, the PremiumComponent is supposed to show the design I put in the ticket description, but based on your code for PremiumVNextComponent , that's not included.

If we flipped the feature flag for your ticket, I don't think there would be a way for a Self-Hosted user to upload a Premium License

📸 Screenshots

Screen.Recording.2025-10-17.at.5.11.59.PM.mov

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – cc67bbe7-c883-4711-b2a9-626edc98ff13

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[amorask-bitwarden]

❌ I think the requirements for the defect were to maintain the original self-hosted version of the Premium page when the user's in a self-hosted environment.

This change just tacks on the self-hosted license uploader to the new pricing card format, but a self-hosted user can't interact with a pricing card because you can't purchase subscriptions on a self-hosted instance.

On a self-hosted instance, the user should see the following until we have new designs:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 39.19%. Comparing base (97906ff) to head (0dbe9fc).
⚠️ Report is 21 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ng/individual/individual-billing-routing.module.ts	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16919      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   39.20%   39.19%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        3463     3463              
  Lines       98181    98188       +7     
  Branches    14750    14750              
==========================================
- Hits        38494    38486       -8     
- Misses      58024    58038      +14     
- Partials     1663     1664       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud