-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Improve formatting for execution order ambiguity reports #6071
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think ultimately we probably want:
- String-based formatting
- tracing warn! macro
- Use of shortnames by default
but I'm fine to defer that work to a follow-up PR(s). I like the error output much better now.
(Also: yay for tests being merged so I don't need to worry about whether the core logic was broken.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems OK, but I'm not confident enough to assess the implementation since I'm not familiar with ambiguity detection internals.
From Discord. |
Related to #4299
Objective
This is how ambiguities are reported currently.
Solution
Example output