Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use pool to manage MLIR Context #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jackalcooper
Copy link
Contributor

@jackalcooper jackalcooper commented Jan 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added multi-threaded compilation support using Elixir processes and MLIR capabilities.
    • Introduced a new context pool management system for efficient resource handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and streamlined compilation process.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies (beaver to v0.4.2, added nimble_pool v1.0).
    • Refined JIT and context management across multiple modules.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to reflect new multi-threaded compilation capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces multi-threaded compilation support for the charms package. The changes involve creating a new Charms.ContextPool module using NimblePool to manage MLIR contexts, updating the application's supervision strategy, and modifying various modules to leverage this new context pooling mechanism. The implementation focuses on improving resource management and concurrent processing capabilities, with updates spanning across initialization, compilation, and context handling processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added documentation for multi-threaded compilation support
lib/charms/application.ex Added Charms.ContextPool.specs() to application children
lib/charms/context_pool.ex New module implementing context pooling with NimblePool
lib/charms/defm/definition.ex Updated compilation process with new error handling and IR transformation
lib/charms/defm/expander.ex Modified context management and function call handling
lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex Shifted from function-level to module-level MLIR operations
lib/charms/diagnostic.ex Removed compile_error_message/1 function
lib/charms/jit.ex Restructured JIT context management
lib/charms/pointer.ex Updated memory reference type creation methods
lib/charms/simd.ex Modified vector type creation method
mix.exs Updated beaver dependency and added nimble_pool
test/call_test.exs Changed expected error type in test case
test/defm_test.exs Removed unused alias in test case
test/test_helper.exs Added PID output to test helper

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant App as Charms.Application
    participant Pool as Charms.ContextPool
    participant JIT as Charms.JIT
    participant Expander as Charms.Defm.Expander

    App->>Pool: Initialize Context Pool
    Expander->>Pool: Checkout Context
    Pool-->>Expander: Provide Context
    Expander->>JIT: Use Context for Compilation
    JIT->>Pool: Return Context
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • JIT module supervision #22: The changes in the main PR regarding multi-threaded compilation support may relate to the modifications in the JIT engine retrieval method in this PR, as both involve enhancements to the compilation process.
  • Replace Agent with LockedCache as to cache JIT compilation #25: The addition of a child specification in the Charms.Application module could be related to the multi-threaded capabilities mentioned in the main PR, as both aim to improve the application's functionality.
  • Init JIT in wrapper function #29: The changes in the JIT initialization and the handling of modules could relate to the multi-threaded compilation support, as both involve improvements in the compilation workflow.

Poem

🐰 Threads dancing, contexts light,
Pooling resources with rabbit might!
MLIR spinning, compilation's glee,
Concurrent magic, now we're free!
Charms leaps forward, code so bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7263e2 and ec93de8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • mix.exs (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • mix.exs

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
lib/charms/jit.ex (1)

Line range hint 73-87: Consider adding error-handling around IR creation.

The do_init/2 function uses MLIR.Module.create!/2 calls within an Enum.map/2 flow. If any creation fails, it will raise an exception. If this is intentional, it’s fine. Otherwise, consider rescuing failures to allow more graceful fallback or user-friendly messages.

lib/charms/context_pool.ex (1)

22-24: Document the purpose of :dummy_pool_state.

The use of :dummy_pool_state in the pool specification needs clarification.

Add a module or function documentation explaining why a dummy state is used:

+@doc """
+Provides NimblePool specifications for the MLIR context pool.
+Uses :dummy_pool_state as the pool doesn't require any state management.
+"""
 def specs() do
   {NimblePool, worker: {__MODULE__, :dummy_pool_state}, name: __MODULE__}
 end
lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (1)

62-62: Document the unused state parameter.

The _state parameter in the run function signature should be documented.

+@doc """
+Implements the MLIR pass for creating absent functions.
+
+## Parameters
+
+  * mod - The MLIR module to process
+  * _state - Unused state parameter required by MLIR.Pass behavior
+"""
 def run(mod, _state) do
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cafb76 and f7263e2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • mix.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • lib/charms/application.ex (1 hunks)
  • lib/charms/context_pool.ex (1 hunks)
  • lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (3 hunks)
  • lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (3 hunks)
  • lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (2 hunks)
  • lib/charms/diagnostic.ex (0 hunks)
  • lib/charms/jit.ex (3 hunks)
  • lib/charms/pointer.ex (3 hunks)
  • lib/charms/simd.ex (1 hunks)
  • mix.exs (1 hunks)
  • test/call_test.exs (1 hunks)
  • test/defm_test.exs (0 hunks)
  • test/test_helper.exs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • test/defm_test.exs
  • lib/charms/diagnostic.ex
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • test/test_helper.exs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[misspelling] ~11-~11: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... built upon Elixir processes and MLIR's multi-threaded capabilities - [ ] SIMD support - [ ] ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build and test (1.18)
  • GitHub Check: Build and test (1.17)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
lib/charms/jit.ex (2)

9-9: Removed ctx field from JIT struct - verify external references.

By removing the ctx field from the JIT struct, context ownership now depends entirely on external management (i.e., via NimblePool). This is fine, but ensure that any external code that previously accessed ctx through the struct is updated accordingly.


128-133: Double-check concurrency behavior when checking out the context from the pool.

Calling NimblePool.checkout! within LockedCache.run/2 means the context is checked out for the duration of do_init/2. Verify that this usage pattern works correctly under concurrent calls, ensuring that the context is always returned to the pool for reuse after initialization is done.

lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (2)

70-87: Validate error handling when expanding AST with a pooled context.

The NimblePool.checkout! callback returns both the expanded AST and the context. If expand/3 raises an exception, it may leave the context in an undefined state. Consider confirming that NimblePool safely reclaims or reinitializes contexts in case of expansion failures.


1270-1280: Confirm all remote MLIR calls require or skip the context appropriately.

Here, fun in [:unranked_tensor, :unranked_tensor!, :vector, :vector!, :complex] does not append the context, while all other calls append [ctx: state.mlir.ctx]. Ensure each function’s arity and usage matches these assumptions so that calls won’t break if the context is unexpectedly missing or passed.

lib/charms/application.ex (1)

6-7: Ensure supervision order is correct.

Adding Charms.ContextPool.specs() to the supervisor children is appropriate. Verify that any dependencies or initialization order (for example, if LockedCache indirectly depends on the context pool) are satisfied. Otherwise, you might reorder the children.

test/call_test.exs (1)

9-9: LGTM! Error handling improvement.

The change from CompileError to ArgumentError with a more descriptive message improves error reporting for missing function calls.

lib/charms/simd.ex (1)

43-43: LGTM! Consistent error handling.

The change to Type.vector! aligns with the fail-fast approach and is consistent with similar changes across the codebase.

lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (1)

4-4: LGTM! Appropriate pass level change.

The change to "builtin.module" is more appropriate for handling absent functions at the module level.

mix.exs (1)

78-81: LGTM! Dependencies updated for multi-threading support.

The changes look good:

  • Updated beaver to latest version
  • Added nimble_pool for efficient context pooling

Let's verify the dependency versions:

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies are using appropriate version constraints

Both packages are using suitable version constraints:

  • beaver "~> 0.4.2" matches the latest version
  • nimble_pool "~> 1.0" allows for compatible updates including the latest 1.1.0
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest versions and any security advisories
curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/beaver | jq '.latest_stable_version'
curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/nimble_pool | jq '.latest_stable_version'

Length of output: 166

lib/charms/pointer.ex (1)

36-36: LGTM! Using fail-fast variants for type creation.

The change to use Type.memref! instead of Type.memref is a good practice as it helps catch type creation errors early in the development cycle.

Also applies to: 42-42, 55-55, 121-121

lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (3)

253-253: LGTM! Using fail-fast variant for module creation.

Using MLIR.Module.create! instead of create aligns with the fail-fast approach seen in other changes.


312-317: LGTM! Improved error handling with verification.

Good improvement in error handling:

  • Added verification in the second run
  • Better formatting of diagnostic messages

303-304: Verify the impact of pipeline changes.

The changes to the transformation pipeline:

  1. Using append instead of nested for CreateAbsentFunc
  2. Disabling verifier in the first run
    These changes could affect the compilation process.

Let's check for any related test cases:

Also applies to: 309-309

✅ Verification successful

Pipeline changes are intentionally structured and verified.

The changes to the transformation pipeline are well-designed:

  • Using append for CreateAbsentFunc is correct as it needs module-level visibility
  • The two-phase verification pattern (disabled then enabled) is a standard approach for structural transformations

The changes are supported by existing test coverage in call_test.exs and defm_test.exs.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests related to CreateAbsentFunc and pipeline verification
rg -l "CreateAbsentFunc|Composer.run" test/

Length of output: 45


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search with broader patterns and case-insensitive
echo "=== Searching for test files and implementation files ==="
rg -i "defm|beaver.composer|pipeline" test/ lib/

echo "=== Looking for specific pipeline configuration ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'Beaver.Composer.$_($$$)'

echo "=== Checking for compilation-related tests ==="
fd -e ex -e exs . test/ -x grep -l "test\|describe\|assert"

Length of output: 19458

README.md (1)

11-11: LGTM! Documentation updated for new feature.

Clear documentation of the new multi-threaded compilation feature, highlighting its foundation on Elixir processes and MLIR capabilities.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~11-~11: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... built upon Elixir processes and MLIR's multi-threaded capabilities - [ ] SIMD support - [ ] ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)

@jackalcooper jackalcooper merged commit 7b0f558 into main Jan 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@jackalcooper jackalcooper deleted the update-for-new-diagnostics-apis branch January 29, 2025 03:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant