-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use pool to manage MLIR Context #61
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multi-threaded compilation support for the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant App as Charms.Application
participant Pool as Charms.ContextPool
participant JIT as Charms.JIT
participant Expander as Charms.Defm.Expander
App->>Pool: Initialize Context Pool
Expander->>Pool: Checkout Context
Pool-->>Expander: Provide Context
Expander->>JIT: Use Context for Compilation
JIT->>Pool: Return Context
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
lib/charms/jit.ex (1)
Line range hint
73-87
: Consider adding error-handling around IR creation.The
do_init/2
function usesMLIR.Module.create!/2
calls within anEnum.map/2
flow. If any creation fails, it will raise an exception. If this is intentional, it’s fine. Otherwise, consider rescuing failures to allow more graceful fallback or user-friendly messages.lib/charms/context_pool.ex (1)
22-24
: Document the purpose of :dummy_pool_state.The use of
:dummy_pool_state
in the pool specification needs clarification.Add a module or function documentation explaining why a dummy state is used:
+@doc """ +Provides NimblePool specifications for the MLIR context pool. +Uses :dummy_pool_state as the pool doesn't require any state management. +""" def specs() do {NimblePool, worker: {__MODULE__, :dummy_pool_state}, name: __MODULE__} endlib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (1)
62-62
: Document the unused state parameter.The
_state
parameter in the run function signature should be documented.+@doc """ +Implements the MLIR pass for creating absent functions. + +## Parameters + + * mod - The MLIR module to process + * _state - Unused state parameter required by MLIR.Pass behavior +""" def run(mod, _state) do
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mix.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
README.md
(1 hunks)lib/charms/application.ex
(1 hunks)lib/charms/context_pool.ex
(1 hunks)lib/charms/defm/definition.ex
(3 hunks)lib/charms/defm/expander.ex
(3 hunks)lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex
(2 hunks)lib/charms/diagnostic.ex
(0 hunks)lib/charms/jit.ex
(3 hunks)lib/charms/pointer.ex
(3 hunks)lib/charms/simd.ex
(1 hunks)mix.exs
(1 hunks)test/call_test.exs
(1 hunks)test/defm_test.exs
(0 hunks)test/test_helper.exs
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- test/defm_test.exs
- lib/charms/diagnostic.ex
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/test_helper.exs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[misspelling] ~11-~11: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... built upon Elixir processes and MLIR's multi-threaded capabilities - [ ] SIMD support - [ ] ...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Build and test (1.18)
- GitHub Check: Build and test (1.17)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
lib/charms/jit.ex (2)
9-9
: Removedctx
field from JIT struct - verify external references.By removing the
ctx
field from the JIT struct, context ownership now depends entirely on external management (i.e., viaNimblePool
). This is fine, but ensure that any external code that previously accessedctx
through the struct is updated accordingly.
128-133
: Double-check concurrency behavior when checking out the context from the pool.Calling
NimblePool.checkout!
withinLockedCache.run/2
means the context is checked out for the duration ofdo_init/2
. Verify that this usage pattern works correctly under concurrent calls, ensuring that the context is always returned to the pool for reuse after initialization is done.lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (2)
70-87
: Validate error handling when expanding AST with a pooled context.The
NimblePool.checkout!
callback returns both the expanded AST and the context. Ifexpand/3
raises an exception, it may leave the context in an undefined state. Consider confirming thatNimblePool
safely reclaims or reinitializes contexts in case of expansion failures.
1270-1280
: Confirm all remote MLIR calls require or skip the context appropriately.Here,
fun in [:unranked_tensor, :unranked_tensor!, :vector, :vector!, :complex]
does not append the context, while all other calls append[ctx: state.mlir.ctx]
. Ensure each function’s arity and usage matches these assumptions so that calls won’t break if the context is unexpectedly missing or passed.lib/charms/application.ex (1)
6-7
: Ensure supervision order is correct.Adding
Charms.ContextPool.specs()
to the supervisor children is appropriate. Verify that any dependencies or initialization order (for example, ifLockedCache
indirectly depends on the context pool) are satisfied. Otherwise, you might reorder the children.test/call_test.exs (1)
9-9
: LGTM! Error handling improvement.The change from
CompileError
toArgumentError
with a more descriptive message improves error reporting for missing function calls.lib/charms/simd.ex (1)
43-43
: LGTM! Consistent error handling.The change to
Type.vector!
aligns with the fail-fast approach and is consistent with similar changes across the codebase.lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (1)
4-4
: LGTM! Appropriate pass level change.The change to "builtin.module" is more appropriate for handling absent functions at the module level.
mix.exs (1)
78-81
: LGTM! Dependencies updated for multi-threading support.The changes look good:
- Updated beaver to latest version
- Added nimble_pool for efficient context pooling
Let's verify the dependency versions:
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are using appropriate version constraints ✅
Both packages are using suitable version constraints:
- beaver "~> 0.4.2" matches the latest version
- nimble_pool "~> 1.0" allows for compatible updates including the latest 1.1.0
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check latest versions and any security advisories curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/beaver | jq '.latest_stable_version' curl -s https://hex.pm/api/packages/nimble_pool | jq '.latest_stable_version'Length of output: 166
lib/charms/pointer.ex (1)
36-36
: LGTM! Using fail-fast variants for type creation.The change to use
Type.memref!
instead ofType.memref
is a good practice as it helps catch type creation errors early in the development cycle.Also applies to: 42-42, 55-55, 121-121
lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (3)
253-253
: LGTM! Using fail-fast variant for module creation.Using
MLIR.Module.create!
instead ofcreate
aligns with the fail-fast approach seen in other changes.
312-317
: LGTM! Improved error handling with verification.Good improvement in error handling:
- Added verification in the second run
- Better formatting of diagnostic messages
303-304
: Verify the impact of pipeline changes.The changes to the transformation pipeline:
- Using
append
instead ofnested
for CreateAbsentFunc- Disabling verifier in the first run
These changes could affect the compilation process.Let's check for any related test cases:
Also applies to: 309-309
✅ Verification successful
Pipeline changes are intentionally structured and verified.
The changes to the transformation pipeline are well-designed:
- Using
append
for CreateAbsentFunc is correct as it needs module-level visibility- The two-phase verification pattern (disabled then enabled) is a standard approach for structural transformations
The changes are supported by existing test coverage in
call_test.exs
anddefm_test.exs
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests related to CreateAbsentFunc and pipeline verification rg -l "CreateAbsentFunc|Composer.run" test/Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search with broader patterns and case-insensitive echo "=== Searching for test files and implementation files ===" rg -i "defm|beaver.composer|pipeline" test/ lib/ echo "=== Looking for specific pipeline configuration ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Beaver.Composer.$_($$$)' echo "=== Checking for compilation-related tests ===" fd -e ex -e exs . test/ -x grep -l "test\|describe\|assert"Length of output: 19458
README.md (1)
11-11
: LGTM! Documentation updated for new feature.Clear documentation of the new multi-threaded compilation feature, highlighting its foundation on Elixir processes and MLIR capabilities.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~11-~11: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ... built upon Elixir processes and MLIR's multi-threaded capabilities - [ ] SIMD support - [ ] ...(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_THREADED)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
beaver
to v0.4.2, addednimble_pool
v1.0).Documentation