Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish 0.1.1 and bump 0.1.2-dev #42

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024
Merged

Publish 0.1.1 and bump 0.1.2-dev #42

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024

Conversation

jackalcooper
Copy link
Contributor

@jackalcooper jackalcooper commented Oct 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a comprehensive tutorial on programming with Charms, covering installation, module setup, function definitions, memory management, control flow, and error handling.
    • Added multiple new modules to enhance the tutorial experience.
  • Chores

    • Updated project version from "0.1.1-dev" to "0.1.2-dev" and changed Elixir version constraint to a stable release.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a comprehensive tutorial on programming with Charms, an Elixir compiler for JIT compilation. It includes installation instructions, module setup, function definitions, and memory operations. The tutorial covers control flow, constants, and error handling, detailing how to work with native types and interact with Erlang's ENIF functions. Additionally, the mix.exs file is updated to reflect a new development version and a stable Elixir version constraint.

Changes

File Change Summary
guides/programming-with-charms.livemd Added multiple new modules including Charming, HaveFun, CallingAnother, Dangerous, PlayWithErlangRuntime, ControlFlowIf, ControlFlowWhile, Constantly, and Exceptional, along with a tutorial on programming with Charms.
mix.exs Updated Charms.MixProject to change the version from "0.1.1-dev" to "0.1.2-dev" and modified the elixir version constraint from "~> 1.17-dev" to "~> 1.17".

Possibly related PRs

  • Init JIT in wrapper function #29: The changes in the ENIFQuickSort, ENIFTimSort, and AddTwoIntVec modules involve updating the use Charms directive to include init: false, which relates to the initialization behavior of the Charms library, a key aspect of the main PR's focus on programming with Charms.

Poem

In the land of code where Charms do play,
New modules sprout like flowers in May.
With functions and pointers, we dance and we twirl,
In Elixir's embrace, watch our dreams unfurl.
So hop along, friends, let’s code and create,
For in this new world, we celebrate fate! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
guides/programming-with-charms.livemd (7)

Line range hint 28-38: Consider enhancing the example function.

While the current example effectively demonstrates the use of defm and type annotations, consider modifying the function to perform a simple operation on both arguments. This would better illustrate the potential of Charms for actual computations.

For example:

defm my_fun(env, arg1 :: Term.t(), arg2 :: Term.t()) :: Term.t() do
  result = call :erlang.+(arg1, arg2) :: Term.t()
  func.return(result)
end

This change would demonstrate how to perform operations on the input arguments while still using the Charms DSL.


Line range hint 46-65: LGTM: Effective demonstration of function calls in Charms.

The code block effectively demonstrates both intra-module and inter-module function calls using the call macro. The explanation is clear and accurate.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the difference between using call and not using it, as both are demonstrated in the example:

# Using `call` allows explicit type annotation
fun = call callee_function(arg) :: Term.t()

# Without `call`, type is inferred
fun = callee_function(arg)

This addition would help clarify when to use each approach.


Line range hint 71-85: LGTM: Effective demonstration of pointer operations with appropriate warning.

The code block effectively demonstrates basic pointer operations using the Pointer module. The warning about potential BEAM crashes is important and well-placed.

Consider adding a note about best practices for memory management to enhance safety:

defm use_a_pointer(env, value :: Term.t()) :: Term.t() do
  ptr = Pointer.allocate(Term.t())
  Pointer.store(value, ptr)
  result = Pointer.load(Term.t(), ptr)
  Pointer.free(ptr)  # Best practice: Free allocated memory
  result
end

This addition would emphasize the importance of proper memory management when using low-level operations.


Line range hint 91-116: LGTM: Effective demonstration of native types and ENIF functions.

The code block effectively demonstrates the use of native types and ENIF functions in Charms. The explanation is clear and the example is well-constructed.

To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of each ENIF function used:

defm add(env :: Env.t(), i) :: Term.t() do
  i_ptr = Pointer.allocate(i32())
  # Convert Erlang term to C integer
  enif_get_int(env, i, i_ptr)
  i = Pointer.load(i32(), i_ptr)
  sum = do_add(i, i)
  # Convert C integer back to Erlang term
  enif_make_int(env, sum)
end

This addition would help readers understand the role of each ENIF function in the context of Charms.


Line range hint 124-186: LGTM: Effective demonstration of control flow structures in Charms.

Both the if-else and while loop examples effectively demonstrate how to implement control flow in Charms functions. The explanations are clear and the examples are well-constructed.

For the while loop example, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each pointer:

defm loop_example(env, list :: Term.t()) :: Term.t() do
  movable_list_ptr = Pointer.allocate(Term.t())  # Pointer to traverse the list
  Pointer.store(list, movable_list_ptr)
  head_ptr = Pointer.allocate(Term.t())  # Pointer to store current list element
  min_ptr = Pointer.allocate(Term.t())   # Pointer to store minimum value

  # ... rest of the function ...
end

This addition would help readers understand the role of each pointer in the context of the algorithm.


Line range hint 192-204: LGTM: Effective demonstration of constant usage in Charms.

The code block effectively demonstrates how to define and use constants in Charms functions using the const macro. The explanation is clear and the example is well-constructed.

To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the benefit of using const:

defm how_much(env) :: Term.t() do
  # Using const for compile-time optimization
  zero = const 0 :: i32()
  enif_make_int(env, zero + 100)
end

This addition would help readers understand the purpose and advantages of using const in Charms functions.


Line range hint 210-244: LGTM: Effective demonstration of error handling in Charms.

The code block effectively demonstrates how to handle errors and raise exceptions in Charms functions. The explanation is clear and the example covers different error scenarios.

To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the difference between Charms' exception handling and Elixir's:

defm raise_it(env, i :: Term.t()) :: Term.t() do
  i_ptr = Pointer.allocate(i32())

  if enif_get_int(env, i, i_ptr) != 0 do
    if Pointer.load(i32(), i_ptr) > 0 do
      i
    else
      # Note: Unlike Elixir's raise, this doesn't alter control flow
      enif_raise_exception(env, @err_v)
    end
  else
    enif_raise_exception(env, @err_t)
  end
end

This addition would help readers understand the nuances of exception handling in Charms compared to standard Elixir.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd2e676 and 39c8c81.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • guides/programming-with-charms.livemd (1 hunks)
  • mix.exs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
mix.exs (3)

7-7: Version bump looks good.

The version change from "0.1.1-dev" to "0.1.2-dev" aligns with the PR objectives of publishing 0.1.1 and bumping to 0.1.2-dev. This follows standard semantic versioning practices.


8-8: Elixir version constraint update looks good, but please verify.

The change from "> 1.17-dev" to "> 1.17" moves the project from using a development version of Elixir to a stable version. This is generally a good practice for production-ready code.

However, please confirm that this change is intentional and that the project is ready to move away from the development version of Elixir. Ensure that all features used in the project are compatible with the stable 1.17.x versions.


7-8: Overall changes look good, consider additional verifications.

The version bump and Elixir version constraint update are appropriate for a minor version release. These changes, especially the move to a stable Elixir version, align well with the introduction of a new tutorial mentioned in the AI summary.

To ensure consistency across the project:

  1. Verify that the new tutorial content is compatible with Elixir 1.17 stable.
  2. Check if any other files (e.g., README, documentation) need updates to reflect the new version or Elixir requirements.
  3. Ensure that all project dependencies are compatible with Elixir 1.17 stable.
guides/programming-with-charms.livemd (2)

3-7: LGTM: Installation code block is correct and up-to-date.

The installation command uses the latest version of Charms (0.1.1), which aligns with the PR objective of publishing version 0.1.1.


Line range hint 1-246: Excellent tutorial on programming with Charms!

This comprehensive guide effectively covers all major aspects of programming with Charms, including:

  • Setting up modules
  • Defining and calling functions
  • Working with pointers and memory operations
  • Using native types and ENIF functions
  • Implementing control flow
  • Working with constants
  • Handling errors

The explanations are clear, and the examples are well-constructed and demonstrate practical usage of Charms features. The tutorial strikes a good balance between introducing basic concepts and showcasing more advanced techniques.

The minor suggestions provided in the review comments would further enhance the clarity and educational value of the tutorial. Consider incorporating these suggestions to make the guide even more comprehensive and user-friendly.

Overall, this tutorial serves as an excellent resource for developers looking to get started with Charms and understand its capabilities.

@jackalcooper jackalcooper merged commit ceafd74 into main Oct 20, 2024
1 check passed
@jackalcooper jackalcooper deleted the publish-0.1.1 branch October 20, 2024 08:43
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant