chore: verify our bzl_libraries #3835
Closed
+15
−528
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Aspect_bazel_lib fork has an action to extract docs from each bzl_library, ensuring they are well-formed
alexeagle
force-pushed
the
check_bzls
branch
4 times, most recently
from
3b348a6 to
6f5c5cd
Compare
API docs are now rendered on an external pipeline
jbedard
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aspect_bazel_lib fork has an action to extract docs from each bzl_library, ensuring they are well-formed.
Also remove the stardoc setup which is massively bloated from the days when JS rules were in this repo.
See bazelbuild/bazel-skylib#568