Skip to content

Conversation

mulmarta
Copy link
Contributor

@mulmarta mulmarta commented Oct 1, 2025

The PR makes the implementation conformant with the following rule mandated by RFC 9420, Section 7.2:

The capabilities field indicates the protocol features that the client supports, including protocol versions, cipher suites, credential types, non-default proposal types, and non-default extension types. The following proposal and extension types are considered "default" and MUST NOT be listed
[...]

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT license.

@mulmarta mulmarta requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 20:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.52%. Comparing base (0e602b4) to head (40040c5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #319      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.50%   88.52%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         182      182              
  Lines       29002    29043      +41     
==========================================
+ Hits        25668    25709      +41     
  Misses       3334     3334              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tomleavy tomleavy merged commit 738e250 into main Oct 3, 2025
40 of 41 checks passed
@tomleavy tomleavy deleted the validate-non-default-values branch October 3, 2025 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants