Add NornicDB to the database list in README

[orneryd]

Required links

Provide the links below. Our CI will automatically validate them.

• Forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc): https://github.com/orneryd/NornicDB
• pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/orneryd/nornicdb
• goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/orneryd/nornicdb
• Coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.): https://coveralls.io/github/orneryd/NornicDB

Pre-submission checklist

• I have read the Contribution Guidelines
• I have read the Quality Standards

Repository requirements

These are validated automatically by CI:

• The repo has a go.mod file and at least one SemVer release (vX.Y.Z).
• The repo has an open source license.
• The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
• The repo documentation has a goreportcard link (grade A- or better).
• The repo documentation has a coverage service link.

These are recommended and reported as warnings:

• The repo has a continuous integration process (GitHub Actions, etc.).
• CI runs tests that must pass before merging.

Pull Request content

These are validated automatically by CI:

• This PR adds/removes/changes only one package.
• The package has been added in alphabetical order.
• The link text is the exact project name.
• The description is clear, concise, non-promotional, and ends with a period.
• The link in README.md matches the forge link above.

Category quality

Note: new categories require a minimum of 3 packages.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure they still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

• The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks

Required checks

✅ Repo: accessible, has go.mod and SemVer release
✅ pkg.go.dev: OK
✅ Go Report Card: OK (grade unknown)

Additional checks

⚠️ License: no open source license detected

How to fix: Add a LICENSE file to your repository root.
Choose one at https://choosealicense.com — common choices for Go projects: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause.
⚠️ Maturity: repo appears to have less than 5 months of history
How to fix: Your repository needs at least 5 months of history since the first commit.
Please resubmit after the repository meets this requirement.
✅ CI/CD: GitHub Actions workflows detected
✅ README: present
⚠️ Coverage: missing from PR body
How to fix: Add a coverage service link to your PR description:

Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/your-org/your-project

Popular options: [Codecov](https://codecov.io), [Coveralls](https://coveralls.io). Integrate one with your CI to track coverage automatically.


_These checks are automated and do not replace maintainer review. See [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for full guidelines._

---

## PR Diff Validation

### Content checks

✅ **Files changed**: only README.md
✅ **Single item**: one package added
✅ **Link consistency**: README link matches forge link in PR body
✅ **Link text**: matches repository name
✅ **Description**: ends with punctuation
✅ **Description tone**: no promotional language detected
✅ **Category size**: Databases Implemented in Go has 46 items


_Automated diff validation — does not replace maintainer review._
<!-- Sticky Pull Request Commentpr-quality-check -->

[orneryd]

https://github.com/orneryd/NornicDB/blob/main/LICENSE.md i just renamed it from https://github.com/orneryd/NornicDB/blob/main/LICENSE apparently it doesn't like that it didn't have a .md at the end. Github did and shows the license section with it so i thought that was good. its MIT licensed.

[orneryd]

just barely hit 90% TC last night too. hope it helps

[orneryd]

@avelino ping? 😬🫶