Skip to content

Conversation

@maple525866
Copy link
Contributor

@maple525866 maple525866 commented Oct 17, 2025

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Since the author of PR No. 7643 did not respond for a long time, we merged his code first. This PR is used to ensure the code format is consistent with the registered PR.

also,I add UT for dm module to increase test coverage

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #7642

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

mvn clean test

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@maple525866
Copy link
Contributor Author

@YvCeung PTAL

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.70%. Comparing base (9b97559) to head (97d26ba).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #7709      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.41%   61.70%   +0.28%     
- Complexity      682      684       +2     
============================================
  Files          1324     1324              
  Lines         50047    50046       -1     
  Branches       5910     5910              
============================================
+ Hits          30738    30879     +141     
+ Misses        16531    16377     -154     
- Partials       2778     2790      +12     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ta/rm/datasource/undo/dm/DmUndoDeleteExecutor.java 93.10% <100.00%> (+93.10%) ⬆️

... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@YvCeung
Copy link
Contributor

YvCeung commented Oct 18, 2025

@YvCeung PTAL

Please turn off pr first and then turn it on again to ensure the successful execution of ci

@YvCeung YvCeung closed this Oct 18, 2025
@YvCeung YvCeung reopened this Oct 18, 2025
@YvCeung
Copy link
Contributor

YvCeung commented Oct 18, 2025

@maple525866 Could you add some unit tests? Thanks

@maple525866
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maple525866 Could you add some unit tests? Thanks

OK, please wait.

@maple525866 maple525866 changed the title optimize: spotless apply for issue #7642 test: add UT for dm module and spotless apply for issue #7642 Oct 18, 2025
@YvCeung YvCeung self-requested a review October 18, 2025 11:17
@YvCeung YvCeung changed the title test: add UT for dm module and spotless apply for issue #7642 test: add UT for dm module Oct 18, 2025
@YvCeung
Copy link
Contributor

YvCeung commented Oct 18, 2025

LGTM

@YvCeung YvCeung removed their request for review October 18, 2025 11:19
@YvCeung YvCeung merged commit 57d170d into apache:2.x Oct 18, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
slievrly pushed a commit to slievrly/fescar that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dm8事务回滚的时候,用的不是数据库自增主键

2 participants