Skip to content

kie-issues#1914: infinispan removal#2211

Open
porcelli wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
porcelli:kie-issues#1914
Open

kie-issues#1914: infinispan removal#2211
porcelli wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
porcelli:kie-issues#1914

Conversation

@porcelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@porcelli porcelli commented Apr 6, 2025

@kie-ci3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kie-ci3 commented Apr 7, 2025

PR job #1 was: UNSTABLE
Possible explanation: This should be test failures

Reproducer

build-chain build full_downstream -f 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/${AUTHOR:apache}/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/${BRANCH:main}/.ci/buildchain-config-pr-cdb.yaml' -o 'bc' -p apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps -u #2211 --skipParallelCheckout

NOTE: To install the build-chain tool, please refer to https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain#local-execution

Please look here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-apps-pr/job/PR-2211/1/display/redirect

Test results:

  • PASSED: 1623
  • FAILED: 3

Those are the test failures:

org.kie.kogito.index.infinispan.ProcessDataIndexInfinispanHttpIT.testProcessInstanceEvents java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to instantiate the test resource org.kie.kogito.index.test.quarkus.http.DataIndexInfinispanHttpQuarkusTestResource
org.kie.kogito.index.infinispan.ProcessDataIndexInfinispanKafkaIT.testProcessInstanceEvents java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to instantiate the test resource org.kie.kogito.index.test.quarkus.kafka.DataIndexInfinispanQuarkusKafkaTestResource
org.kie.kogito.index.ProcessDataIndexInfinispanIT.testProcessInstanceEvents Failed to load ApplicationContext for [WebMergedContextConfiguration@834831b testClass = org.kie.kogito.index.ProcessDataIndexInfinispanIT, locations = [], classes = [org.kie.kogito.KogitoApplication], contextInitializerClasses = [org.kie.kogito.index.spring.KogitoServiceRandomPortSpringTestResource, org.kie.kogito.index.spring.DataIndexInfinispanSpringTestResource], activeProfiles = [], propertySourceDescriptors = [], propertySourceProperties = ["org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTestContextBootstrapper=true", "server.port=0"], contextCustomizers = [org.springframework.boot.test.context.filter.ExcludeFilterContextCustomizer@2a7ed1f, org.springframework.boot.test.json.DuplicateJsonObjectContextCustomizerFactory$DuplicateJsonObjectContextCustomizer@5f0fd5a0, org.springframework.boot.test.mock.mockito.MockitoContextCustomizer@0, org.springframework.boot.test.web.client.TestRestTemplateContextCustomizer@4a00d9cf, org.springframework.boot.test.web.reactor.netty.DisableReactorResourceFactoryGlobalResourcesContextCustomizerFactory$DisableReactorResourceFactoryGlobalResourcesContextCustomizerCustomizer@1c39680d, org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.OnFailureConditionReportContextCustomizerFactory$OnFailureConditionReportContextCustomizer@a37aefe, org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.actuate.observability.ObservabilityContextCustomizerFactory$DisableObservabilityContextCustomizer@1f, org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.properties.PropertyMappingContextCustomizer@0, org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.web.servlet.WebDriverContextCustomizer@6986852, org.springframework.test.context.support.DynamicPropertiesContextCustomizer@0, org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTestAnnotation@d3e56609], resourceBasePath = "src/main/webapp", contextLoader = org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootContextLoader, parent = null]

@fjtirado
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@porcelli Hi Alex, are you still working on that one?

@porcelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

porcelli commented May 1, 2025

@fjtirado right now I'm doing the 10.1.0 release, don't have the bandwidth to tackle both at the same time.

@yesamer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yesamer commented Mar 30, 2026

@porcelli I guess we can close this PR, right? (duplicated of #2297)

@porcelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

unfoturnanly this is a cleanup that has been agreed, but nobody engaged for review.

i'd prefer if we could cleanup this

@yesamer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yesamer commented Mar 30, 2026

@porcelli Just checking—PR #2297 doesn’t supersede this one, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove Infinispan support as Persistence option

4 participants