-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
table_exists unit/integration test for NoSuchTableError #678
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
87c13b5
check if table exists return true else false
MehulBatra cad055e
check if table exists return true else false
MehulBatra be4bb3e
Update tests/catalog/integration_test_dynamodb.py
MehulBatra 0e135bc
pick docstring from superclass
MehulBatra de4031e
fix linting
MehulBatra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we get rid of the other
table_exists
function in the same file?iceberg-python/pyiceberg/catalog/__init__.py
Lines 668 to 673 in 87c13b5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what do you think about changing the REST catalog's
table_exists
implementation to be similar to this?https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/512/files#diff-3bda7391ebd8aa3dcfd6703d8d2764830b9d9c35fa854188a37d69611274bd3dR722-R727
maybe calls
super().table_exists()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is better for RestCatalog to maintain a separate implementation to make a head request to /v1/{prefix}/namespaces/{namespace}/tables/{table}, ref: #512 (comment), #507 (comment)
The try-catch implementation is for other non-rest catalogs and thus it is put in the
MetastoreCatalog
instead of theCatalog
interface.A little bit more context regarding the
MetastoreCatalog
: while working on #498, we found that many helper functions as well as some implementations are for non-rest catalogs only. So we decide to move those to another layer,MetastoreCatalog
to make the inheritance look better: #498 (comment).Do these sound reasonable to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes sense, thanks for the detailed explanation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pushed the changes, as per the discussion, thank you, guys, for the feedback!