-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
fix: add an "expr_planners" method to SessionState #15119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5911f08
add expr_planners to SessionState
niebayes 5989ee8
minor
niebayes a62d0d6
fix ci
niebayes 40a717b
add test
niebayes 5964d82
flatten imports
niebayes 5b3cad1
Merge branch 'main' into chore/add_expr_planners_api
alamb a89fb7f
Merge branch 'main' into chore/add_expr_planners_api
alamb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously, it's the
FunctionRegistry::expr_planners
method gets called and a vector of expression planners is returned.Now, the
SessionState::expr_planners
takes precedence and a slice of expression planners is returned.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alamb Fixed CI. PTAL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand how the code in this PR is any different than what is in on main
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, both the
FunctionRegistry
andSessionState
provide anexpr_planners
method, but they return different data type.FunctionRegistry::expr_planners
returnsVec<dyn ExprPlanner
, andSessionState::expr_planners
returns&[dyn ExprPlanner]
.Now, the
SessionState::expr_planners
takes precedence and a slice of expression planners is returned. Therefore, we have add ato_vec
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's ContextProvider that uses a slice vs Vec. Bit annoying the types are not aligned. SessionState uses
expr_planners: Vec<Arc<dyn ExprPlanner>>,
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Omega359 I agree, it's better to align the types.
I tried to align the types but ran into some difficulties. If both functions return a slice, SessionContext::expr_planners would encounter the error
Cannot return a reference of temporary values
.If both return a Vec, then SessionState's implementation of ContextProvider::get_expr_planners would also face the same issue. The only way to resolve this would be to change the return type of ContextProvider::get_expr_planners to Vec, but that would be a breaking change.