update agents to take advantage of opus 4.5 #12394
Open
+6
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello anthropic!
I don't see a CONTRIBUTING.md file, so I'm just crossing my fingers and guessing that it's fine to open a PR. The plugin-dev readme says "This plugin is part of the claude-code-marketplace", which I guess is... this? shrugs.
With the release of the surprisingly cheap Opus 4.5, it seems hard to justify explicitly using sonnet for the
feature-devcommand. It's an excellent specialized command that I use multiple times per day. My guess is that the choice of sonnet herefor was because opus was insanely expensive a month ago. So... this PR just swaps it out.The alternative would be that these would use
inherit, which would allow people to select down to sonnet if they don't need opus. In theory, it might also work if people really thought they needed to usesonnet[1m]for one of the agents... but I've never been able reasonably use more than 200k tokens in a subagent. I barely ever use more than 400k-500k insonnet[1m]!