Skip to content

Conversation

@pcmoritz
Copy link
Collaborator

found and reported by @nhe150, fixes issue #123

@nhe150
Copy link

nhe150 commented May 20, 2016

get rid of destroy since there is a lot of testing based on driver still need the variable. only put in unpersist().

Find it out the hard way.

@nhe150
Copy link

nhe150 commented May 20, 2016

there is interleaving issue to use unpersist() also.

@nhe150
Copy link

nhe150 commented May 20, 2016

find out it is due to learning rate issue. both destroy and unpersist() is good to be used.
some learning rate will cause worker to learn nothing, the weight become NaN. :(

@nhe150
Copy link

nhe150 commented Jun 7, 2016

This is also related to bytedeco/javacpp-presets#238

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants