feat: comprehensive architecture improvements for error handling, testing, and configuration #133

ajitpratap0 · 2025-11-27T07:39:08Z

Summary

This PR implements a major architectural improvement initiative to enhance error handling, testing coverage, and configuration management across the GoSQLX codebase. The changes ensure consistency between the SDK, CLI, LSP server, and VSCode extension.

Key Improvements

Structured Error Codes: Comprehensive error code system (E1xxx-E4xxx) across tokenizer, parser, and all components
Unified Configuration: New pkg/config package providing consistent configuration across CLI, LSP, and SDK
Enhanced Testing: Significant test coverage improvements with new benchmarks
Documentation: Updated documentation for accuracy and completeness

Changes Made

1. Structured Error Codes System

Tokenizer (pkg/sql/tokenizer/):

Updated all errors to use structured error codes (E1001-E1005)
Errors include location information, helpful hints, and documentation links

Parser (pkg/sql/parser/):

Updated 50+ fmt.Errorf calls across 8 files to use structured errors
Files updated: parser.go, expressions.go, dml.go, select.go, cte.go, ddl.go, grouping.go, token_converter.go
Error codes: E2001-E2012 for syntax and parser errors

2. CLI Enhancement (`cmd/gosqlx/internal/output/json.go`)

Added Code field to JSONValidationError and JSONParseError structs
Added extractErrorCode() helper function
Errors now propagate structured error codes to CLI JSON output

3. LSP Integration (`pkg/lsp/handler.go`)

Updated createDiagnosticFromError to extract and display error codes
VS Code Problems panel now shows structured error codes (e.g., "E2001")
Added handler_errorcode_test.go for test coverage

4. Unified Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

New package providing:

config.go - Core Config struct with FormatConfig, ValidationConfig, OutputConfig, etc.
loader.go - LoadFromFile, LoadFromFiles, LoadFromEnvironment, Merge functions
lsp.go - LoadFromLSPInitOptions, ToLSPSettings, FromLSPSettings functions
Full test coverage (38 tests, 78.6% coverage)

5. Testing Improvements

LSP Tests:

handler_test.go - 660 lines testing DocumentSymbol, SignatureHelp, CodeAction, DidClose, DidSave
server_ratelimit_test.go - 400 lines testing rate limiting with concurrent operations
handler_errorcode_test.go - Tests for error code extraction in diagnostics

Benchmarks:

pkg/sql/security/scanner_bench_test.go - 16 benchmark functions for security scanner
pkg/lsp/handler_bench_test.go - 21+ primary benchmarks for LSP operations

6. Documentation Updates

docs/CLI_GUIDE.md - Added watch and lint command documentation
docs/API_REFERENCE.md - Added ValidateMultiple function documentation
docs/ERROR_CODES.md - Added DoS protection codes (E1006, E1007, E1008, E2007)

Error Code Reference

Code Range	Component	Description
E1001-E1005	Tokenizer	Character/string/number parsing errors
E1006-E1008	Tokenizer	DoS protection (input size, token limit, panic)
E2001-E2006	Parser	Syntax errors (unexpected/expected tokens, clauses)
E2007-E2012	Parser	Feature errors (recursion, CTEs, set operations)
E3001-E3004	Semantic	Semantic errors (undefined table/column, type mismatch)
E4001-E4002	Features	Unsupported feature/dialect errors

Test Plan

All existing tests pass with race detection
Pre-commit hooks pass (fmt, vet, tests)
New test files compile and execute correctly
Parser error tests updated for new error message format
Security benchmarks use correct parser API
CI/CD pipeline validates all changes

Files Changed

Category	Files	Lines Changed
Error Handling	10 parser files, 4 tokenizer files	+1200
CLI	1 file	+50
LSP	5 files	+1500
Config	7 files (new package)	+2000
Documentation	3 files	+100
Total	33 files	+5408, -133

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…testing This PR implements a major architectural improvement initiative focused on: ## Structured Error Codes System - Tokenizer: Updated all errors to use structured error codes (E1001-E1005) - Parser: Updated 50+ errors across 8 files to use structured errors (E2001-E2012) - All errors now include: error codes, location info, helpful hints, and doc links ## CLI Enhancement - Added `Code` field to JSON output for validation and parse errors - Errors now propagate structured error codes to CLI output ## LSP Integration - Updated `createDiagnosticFromError` to extract and display error codes - VS Code Problems panel now shows structured error codes ## Unified Configuration Package - Created `pkg/config/` with Config struct, file/env loaders, LSP integration - Test coverage: 78.6% ## Testing Improvements - Added `pkg/lsp/handler_test.go` (660 lines) - Added `pkg/lsp/server_ratelimit_test.go` (400 lines) - Added `pkg/lsp/handler_errorcode_test.go` - Added `pkg/sql/security/scanner_bench_test.go` (16 benchmarks) - Added `pkg/lsp/handler_bench_test.go` (21+ benchmarks) ## Documentation Updates - Updated CLI_GUIDE.md, API_REFERENCE.md, ERROR_CODES.md 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

claude · 2025-11-27T07:39:21Z

Claude finished @ajitpratap0's task —— View job

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

I've completed a detailed review of this substantial architectural improvement PR. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Review Tasks:

Analyze structured error codes system implementation
Review new configuration package design
Evaluate CLI and LSP integration changes
Assess test coverage improvements and benchmarks
Check for potential bugs and security concerns
Review performance considerations
Validate documentation updates

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

Well-organized error codes (E1xxx-E4xxx) with clear categorization
Comprehensive error messages with location info, hints, and documentation links
Proper DoS protection with structured errors for input size/token limits
Error code extraction properly implemented in CLI JSON output (extractErrorCode())

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

Clean separation of concerns with distinct config sections (Format, Validation, Output, LSP, Server)
Multiple loading strategies (files, environment, LSP init options)
Proper validation with comprehensive error checking for all config fields
Excellent defaults with sensible production-ready values
Source tracking to know where config originated

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

Excellent test coverage for config package (78.6% with 38 tests)
Performance benchmarks for LSP operations and security scanner
Rate limiting tests with proper concurrent validation
Error code handling tests for LSP diagnostics

4. Strong Security Practices

DoS protection with MaxInputSize (10MB) and MaxTokens (1M) limits
Panic recovery in tokenizer with structured error reporting
Input validation at multiple layers

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

Issue: In pkg/config/loader.go:266-343, boolean fields only merge when true:

// pkg/config/loader.go:266
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

Problem: This prevents setting booleans to false via environment variables or layered configs.

Fix: Implement explicit tracking of set values:

type FormatConfig struct {
    UppercaseKeywords *bool `yaml:"uppercase_keywords" json:"uppercaseKeywords"`
}

// In mergeInto:
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords != nil {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

Issue: Some parser files still use fmt.Errorf instead of structured errors.

Recommendation: Audit remaining fmt.Errorf calls:

grep -r "fmt.Errorf" pkg/sql/parser/ --exclude="*.md"

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

Missing coverage:

Error code propagation through full parser->CLI->LSP chain
Configuration validation edge cases
Concurrent tokenizer usage with DoS limits

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

Minor optimizations:

extractErrorCode() could cache results for repeated calls
Config validation could be cached after first successful validation

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Excellent design with proper separation of concerns. The multiple loading strategies and merge functionality are well-implemented.

Specific feedback:

DefaultConfig() provides sensible defaults
Validate() is comprehensive and covers edge cases
Environment variable handling is robust
LSP integration functions are well-designed

Error Handling System

Outstanding implementation with proper error categorization and user-friendly messages.

Specific feedback:

Error codes follow clear patterns (E1xxx tokenizer, E2xxx parser, etc.)
Location tracking is accurate
Documentation in ERROR_CODES.md is comprehensive
CLI integration properly extracts and displays codes

Testing Infrastructure

Strong improvements especially for LSP and config packages.

Benchmarks are particularly well-designed:

handler_bench_test.go: 21+ benchmarks covering key operations
scanner_bench_test.go: 16 benchmarks for security scanner
Proper allocation tracking with b.ReportAllocs()

🚨 Security Review

✅ No security concerns found. The PR:

Adds DoS protection without removing existing safeguards
Implements proper input validation
Uses structured error handling that doesn't leak sensitive info
Follows defensive programming practices

📊 Architecture Assessment

The architectural changes are well-designed and production-ready:

Modular design with clear package boundaries
Backwards compatibility maintained
Performance optimizations don't compromise safety
Error handling is comprehensive and user-friendly
Configuration system supports multiple deployment scenarios

📝 Documentation Review

Strong improvements to documentation:

ERROR_CODES.md: Comprehensive with examples and solutions
CLI_GUIDE.md: Added missing commands
API_REFERENCE.md: Updated with new functions

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority: Fix boolean merging logic in config package
Medium Priority: Complete error code migration in remaining parser files
Low Priority: Add integration tests for full error propagation chain
Enhancement: Consider caching for config validation and error code extraction

✅ Final Assessment

This is a high-quality architectural improvement that significantly enhances:

Error handling and debugging capabilities
Configuration management flexibility
Testing infrastructure and reliability
Developer experience

The changes are well-implemented, thoroughly tested, and maintain production stability. The only significant issue is the boolean merging logic, which should be addressed before merge.

Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes - specifically the boolean merging issue in the config package.

- Fix SA4010 lint error in LoadFromFiles() by renaming unused 'errs' to 'triedPaths' and including tried paths in the error message for better debugging - Add documentation comment to mergeInto() explaining the known limitation where boolean fields only merge when true, preventing explicit false override via environment variables 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

claude · 2025-11-27T07:49:32Z

Claude finished @ajitpratap0's task —— View job

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

I've completed a detailed review of this substantial architectural improvement PR. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Review Tasks:

Analyze structured error codes system implementation
Review new configuration package design
Evaluate CLI and LSP integration changes
Assess test coverage improvements and benchmarks
Check for potential bugs and security concerns
Review performance considerations
Validate documentation updates

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

Well-organized error codes (E1xxx-E4xxx) with clear categorization
Comprehensive error messages with location info, hints, and documentation links
Proper DoS protection with structured errors for input size/token limits
Error code extraction properly implemented in CLI JSON output (extractErrorCode())

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

Clean separation of concerns with distinct config sections (Format, Validation, Output, LSP, Server)
Multiple loading strategies (files, environment, LSP init options)
Proper validation with comprehensive error checking for all config fields
Excellent defaults with sensible production-ready values
Source tracking to know where config originated

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

Excellent test coverage for config package (78.6% with 38 tests)
Performance benchmarks for LSP operations and security scanner
Rate limiting tests with proper concurrent validation
Error code handling tests for LSP diagnostics

4. Strong Security Practices

DoS protection with MaxInputSize (10MB) and MaxTokens (1M) limits
Panic recovery in tokenizer with structured error reporting
Input validation at multiple layers

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

Issue: In pkg/config/loader.go:266-343, boolean fields only merge when true:

// pkg/config/loader.go:266
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

Problem: This prevents setting booleans to false via environment variables or layered configs.

Fix: Implement explicit tracking of set values:

type FormatConfig struct {
    UppercaseKeywords *bool `yaml:"uppercase_keywords" json:"uppercaseKeywords"`
}

// In mergeInto:
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords != nil {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

Issue: Some parser files still use fmt.Errorf instead of structured errors.

Recommendation: Audit remaining fmt.Errorf calls:

grep -r "fmt.Errorf" pkg/sql/parser/ --exclude="*.md"

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

Missing coverage:

Error code propagation through full parser->CLI->LSP chain
Configuration validation edge cases
Concurrent tokenizer usage with DoS limits

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

Minor optimizations:

extractErrorCode() could cache results for repeated calls
Config validation could be cached after first successful validation

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Excellent design with proper separation of concerns. The multiple loading strategies and merge functionality are well-implemented.

Specific feedback:

DefaultConfig() provides sensible defaults
Validate() is comprehensive and covers edge cases
Environment variable handling is robust
LSP integration functions are well-designed

Error Handling System

Outstanding implementation with proper error categorization and user-friendly messages.

Specific feedback:

Error codes follow clear patterns (E1xxx tokenizer, E2xxx parser, etc.)
Location tracking is accurate
Documentation in ERROR_CODES.md is comprehensive
CLI integration properly extracts and displays codes

Testing Infrastructure

Strong improvements especially for LSP and config packages.

Benchmarks are particularly well-designed:

handler_bench_test.go: 21+ benchmarks covering key operations
scanner_bench_test.go: 16 benchmarks for security scanner
Proper allocation tracking with b.ReportAllocs()

🚨 Security Review

✅ No security concerns found. The PR:

Adds DoS protection without removing existing safeguards
Implements proper input validation
Uses structured error handling that doesn't leak sensitive info
Follows defensive programming practices

📊 Architecture Assessment

The architectural changes are well-designed and production-ready:

Modular design with clear package boundaries
Backwards compatibility maintained
Performance optimizations don't compromise safety
Error handling is comprehensive and user-friendly
Configuration system supports multiple deployment scenarios

📝 Documentation Review

Strong improvements to documentation:

ERROR_CODES.md: Comprehensive with examples and solutions
CLI_GUIDE.md: Added missing commands
API_REFERENCE.md: Updated with new functions

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority: Fix boolean merging logic in config package
Medium Priority: Complete error code migration in remaining parser files
Low Priority: Add integration tests for full error propagation chain
Enhancement: Consider caching for config validation and error code extraction

✅ Final Assessment

This is a high-quality architectural improvement that significantly enhances:

Error handling and debugging capabilities
Configuration management flexibility
Testing infrastructure and reliability
Developer experience

The changes are well-implemented, thoroughly tested, and maintain production stability. The only significant issue is the boolean merging logic, which should be addressed before merge.

Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes - specifically the boolean merging issue in the config package.

claude · 2025-11-27T07:50:38Z

Claude finished @ajitpratap0's task —— View job

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

I've completed a detailed review of this substantial architectural improvement PR. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Review Tasks:

Analyze structured error codes system implementation
Review new configuration package design
Evaluate CLI and LSP integration changes
Assess test coverage improvements and benchmarks
Check for potential bugs and security concerns
Review performance considerations
Validate documentation updates

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

Well-organized error codes (E1xxx-E4xxx) with clear categorization
Comprehensive error messages with location info, hints, and documentation links
Proper DoS protection with structured errors for input size/token limits
Error code extraction properly implemented in CLI JSON output (extractErrorCode())

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

Clean separation of concerns with distinct config sections (Format, Validation, Output, LSP, Server)
Multiple loading strategies (files, environment, LSP init options)
Proper validation with comprehensive error checking for all config fields
Excellent defaults with sensible production-ready values
Source tracking to know where config originated

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

Excellent test coverage for config package (78.6% with 38 tests)
Performance benchmarks for LSP operations and security scanner
Rate limiting tests with proper concurrent validation
Error code handling tests for LSP diagnostics

4. Strong Security Practices

DoS protection with MaxInputSize (10MB) and MaxTokens (1M) limits
Panic recovery in tokenizer with structured error reporting
Input validation at multiple layers

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

Issue: In pkg/config/loader.go:266-343, boolean fields only merge when true:

// pkg/config/loader.go:266
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

Problem: This prevents setting booleans to false via environment variables or layered configs.

Fix: Implement explicit tracking of set values:

type FormatConfig struct {
    UppercaseKeywords *bool `yaml:"uppercase_keywords" json:"uppercaseKeywords"`
}

// In mergeInto:
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords != nil {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

Issue: Some parser files still use fmt.Errorf instead of structured errors.

Recommendation: Audit remaining fmt.Errorf calls:

grep -r "fmt.Errorf" pkg/sql/parser/ --exclude="*.md"

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

Missing coverage:

Error code propagation through full parser->CLI->LSP chain
Configuration validation edge cases
Concurrent tokenizer usage with DoS limits

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

Minor optimizations:

extractErrorCode() could cache results for repeated calls
Config validation could be cached after first successful validation

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Excellent design with proper separation of concerns. The multiple loading strategies and merge functionality are well-implemented.

Specific feedback:

DefaultConfig() provides sensible defaults
Validate() is comprehensive and covers edge cases
Environment variable handling is robust
LSP integration functions are well-designed

Error Handling System

Outstanding implementation with proper error categorization and user-friendly messages.

Specific feedback:

Error codes follow clear patterns (E1xxx tokenizer, E2xxx parser, etc.)
Location tracking is accurate
Documentation in ERROR_CODES.md is comprehensive
CLI integration properly extracts and displays codes

Testing Infrastructure

Strong improvements especially for LSP and config packages.

Benchmarks are particularly well-designed:

handler_bench_test.go: 21+ benchmarks covering key operations
scanner_bench_test.go: 16 benchmarks for security scanner
Proper allocation tracking with b.ReportAllocs()

🚨 Security Review

✅ No security concerns found. The PR:

Adds DoS protection without removing existing safeguards
Implements proper input validation
Uses structured error handling that doesn't leak sensitive info
Follows defensive programming practices

📊 Architecture Assessment

The architectural changes are well-designed and production-ready:

Modular design with clear package boundaries
Backwards compatibility maintained
Performance optimizations don't compromise safety
Error handling is comprehensive and user-friendly
Configuration system supports multiple deployment scenarios

📝 Documentation Review

Strong improvements to documentation:

ERROR_CODES.md: Comprehensive with examples and solutions
CLI_GUIDE.md: Added missing commands
API_REFERENCE.md: Updated with new functions

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority: Fix boolean merging logic in config package
Medium Priority: Complete error code migration in remaining parser files
Low Priority: Add integration tests for full error propagation chain
Enhancement: Consider caching for config validation and error code extraction

✅ Final Assessment

This is a high-quality architectural improvement that significantly enhances:

Error handling and debugging capabilities
Configuration management flexibility
Testing infrastructure and reliability
Developer experience

The changes are well-implemented, thoroughly tested, and maintain production stability. The only significant issue is the boolean merging logic, which should be addressed before merge.

Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes - specifically the boolean merging issue in the config package.

ajitpratap0 · 2025-11-27T07:50:51Z

Review Feedback Addressed

Fixed in commits `5cb30dc` and `9932cd2`:

SA4010 Lint Error (High Priority) ✅
- Fixed the "result of append is never used" error in LoadFromFiles()
- Renamed errs to triedPaths and now include the tried paths in the error message for better debugging
- Error message now shows: "no config file found in search paths: tried [path1, path2, ...]"
Boolean Merging Logic Documentation (High Priority) ✅
- Added documentation comment to mergeInto() explaining the known limitation
- Created tracking issue Config: Boolean fields cannot be overridden to false via environment variables #134 for the proper fix using *bool pointers
- The limitation: boolean fields only merge when true, preventing explicit false override via environment variables

Regarding other review feedback:

Remaining fmt.Errorf in parser files - These are intentional:
- The remaining uses are for context cancellation wrapping, not parsing errors
- Example: fmt.Errorf("context cancelled while parsing: %w", ctx.Err())
- These appropriately use fmt.Errorf for wrapping context errors
Integration tests - This is tracked as future work, not blocking for this PR

All CI checks should now pass. The boolean merging limitation is documented with a clear path forward in #134.

claude · 2025-11-27T07:57:13Z

Claude finished @ajitpratap0's task —— View job

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

I've completed a detailed review of this substantial architectural improvement PR. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Review Tasks:

Analyze structured error codes system implementation
Review new configuration package design
Evaluate CLI and LSP integration changes
Assess test coverage improvements and benchmarks
Check for potential bugs and security concerns
Review performance considerations
Validate documentation updates

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

Well-organized error codes (E1xxx-E4xxx) with clear categorization
Comprehensive error messages with location info, hints, and documentation links
Proper DoS protection with structured errors for input size/token limits
Error code extraction properly implemented in CLI JSON output (extractErrorCode())

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

Clean separation of concerns with distinct config sections (Format, Validation, Output, LSP, Server)
Multiple loading strategies (files, environment, LSP init options)
Proper validation with comprehensive error checking for all config fields
Excellent defaults with sensible production-ready values
Source tracking to know where config originated

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

Excellent test coverage for config package (78.6% with 38 tests)
Performance benchmarks for LSP operations and security scanner
Rate limiting tests with proper concurrent validation
Error code handling tests for LSP diagnostics

4. Strong Security Practices

DoS protection with MaxInputSize (10MB) and MaxTokens (1M) limits
Panic recovery in tokenizer with structured error reporting
Input validation at multiple layers

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

Issue: In pkg/config/loader.go:266-343, boolean fields only merge when true:

// pkg/config/loader.go:266
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

Problem: This prevents setting booleans to false via environment variables or layered configs.

Fix: Implement explicit tracking of set values:

type FormatConfig struct {
    UppercaseKeywords *bool `yaml:"uppercase_keywords" json:"uppercaseKeywords"`
}

// In mergeInto:
if src.Format.UppercaseKeywords != nil {
    dst.Format.UppercaseKeywords = src.Format.UppercaseKeywords
}

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

Issue: Some parser files still use fmt.Errorf instead of structured errors.

Recommendation: Audit remaining fmt.Errorf calls:

grep -r "fmt.Errorf" pkg/sql/parser/ --exclude="*.md"

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

Missing coverage:

Error code propagation through full parser->CLI->LSP chain
Configuration validation edge cases
Concurrent tokenizer usage with DoS limits

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

Minor optimizations:

extractErrorCode() could cache results for repeated calls
Config validation could be cached after first successful validation

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Excellent design with proper separation of concerns. The multiple loading strategies and merge functionality are well-implemented.

Specific feedback:

DefaultConfig() provides sensible defaults
Validate() is comprehensive and covers edge cases
Environment variable handling is robust
LSP integration functions are well-designed

Error Handling System

Outstanding implementation with proper error categorization and user-friendly messages.

Specific feedback:

Error codes follow clear patterns (E1xxx tokenizer, E2xxx parser, etc.)
Location tracking is accurate
Documentation in ERROR_CODES.md is comprehensive
CLI integration properly extracts and displays codes

Testing Infrastructure

Strong improvements especially for LSP and config packages.

Benchmarks are particularly well-designed:

handler_bench_test.go: 21+ benchmarks covering key operations
scanner_bench_test.go: 16 benchmarks for security scanner
Proper allocation tracking with b.ReportAllocs()

🚨 Security Review

✅ No security concerns found. The PR:

Adds DoS protection without removing existing safeguards
Implements proper input validation
Uses structured error handling that doesn't leak sensitive info
Follows defensive programming practices

📊 Architecture Assessment

The architectural changes are well-designed and production-ready:

Modular design with clear package boundaries
Backwards compatibility maintained
Performance optimizations don't compromise safety
Error handling is comprehensive and user-friendly
Configuration system supports multiple deployment scenarios

📝 Documentation Review

Strong improvements to documentation:

ERROR_CODES.md: Comprehensive with examples and solutions
CLI_GUIDE.md: Added missing commands
API_REFERENCE.md: Updated with new functions

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority: Fix boolean merging logic in config package
Medium Priority: Complete error code migration in remaining parser files
Low Priority: Add integration tests for full error propagation chain
Enhancement: Consider caching for config validation and error code extraction

✅ Final Assessment

This is a high-quality architectural improvement that significantly enhances:

Error handling and debugging capabilities
Configuration management flexibility
Testing infrastructure and reliability
Developer experience

The changes are well-implemented, thoroughly tested, and maintain production stability. The only significant issue is the boolean merging logic, which should be addressed before merge.

Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes - specifically the boolean merging issue in the config package.

This fixes the boolean merging logic issue where boolean fields could not be explicitly set to false via environment variables to override config file values. Changes: - Change all boolean config fields from `bool` to `*bool` pointers: - Format.UppercaseKeywords, Format.Compact - Validation.StrictMode, Validation.Recursive - Output.Verbose - Analyze.Security, Analyze.Performance, Analyze.Complexity, Analyze.All - Server.MetricsEnabled - Add helper functions in config.go: - Bool(v bool) *bool - creates a pointer to a bool - BoolValue(p *bool) bool - returns false if nil - BoolValueOr(p *bool, defaultVal bool) bool - returns default if nil - Update mergeInto() to use != nil checks instead of truthy checks, allowing explicit false values to override defaults - Update LoadFromEnvironment() to use Bool() helper - Update ToLSPSettings/FromLSPSettings to use BoolValue()/Bool() - Update all tests to use BoolValue() for assertions 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

claude · 2025-11-27T08:14:32Z

Claude Code is working…

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

View job run

Add comprehensive integration tests that verify: - Error codes propagate correctly from tokenizer to parser - Error code extraction works with IsCode() helper - Error location information is preserved through parsing pipeline Tests cover various SQL error scenarios: - Unterminated string literals (tokenizer error) - Incomplete SQL statements - Missing table names (INSERT INTO VALUES) - Unexpected token usage (SELECT FROM users) - Multiline error location tracking 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

claude · 2025-11-27T08:19:05Z

Claude finished @ajitpratap0's task —— View job

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

I've completed a detailed review of this substantial architectural improvement PR. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Review Tasks:

Analyze structured error codes system implementation
Review new configuration package design
Evaluate CLI and LSP integration changes
Assess test coverage improvements and benchmarks
Check for potential bugs and security concerns
Review performance considerations
Validate documentation updates

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

Well-organized error codes (E1xxx-E4xxx) with clear categorization
Comprehensive error messages with location info, hints, and documentation links
Proper DoS protection with structured errors for input size/token limits (pkg/sql/tokenizer/tokenizer.go:19-26)
Error code extraction properly implemented in CLI JSON output (cmd/gosqlx/internal/output/json.go:277-286)

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

Clean separation of concerns with distinct config sections (Format, Validation, Output, LSP, Server)
Multiple loading strategies (files, environment, LSP init options) in pkg/config/loader.go
Proper validation with comprehensive error checking for all config fields (pkg/config/config.go:143-217)
Excellent defaults with sensible production-ready values (pkg/config/config.go:97-140)
Source tracking to know where config originated (pkg/config/config.go:40)

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

Excellent test coverage for config package (78.6% with 38 tests per PR description)
Performance benchmarks for LSP operations and security scanner
Rate limiting tests with proper concurrent validation
Error code handling tests for LSP diagnostics (pkg/lsp/handler_errorcode_test.go)

4. Strong Security Practices

DoS protection with MaxInputSize (10MB) and MaxTokens (1M) limits
Panic recovery in tokenizer with structured error reporting
Input validation at multiple layers

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Configuration Merging Design Decision ⭐⭐⭐

Observation: The configuration uses pointer-based boolean fields (*bool) for proper merge behavior:

// pkg/config/config.go:45-46
UppercaseKeywords *bool `yaml:"uppercase_keywords" json:"uppercaseKeywords"`

However, the merging logic in pkg/config/loader.go:262-276 properly handles nil vs non-nil pointers, which is the correct approach for distinguishing "not set" from "explicitly set to false". This design is actually well-implemented and addresses a common configuration merging challenge.

Feedback: The author has already documented this as issue #134. The current implementation is correct and production-ready.

2. Context Cancellation Patterns ⭐⭐

Issue: Some remaining fmt.Errorf calls in parser files are for context cancellation:

// pkg/sql/parser/expressions.go:20
return nil, fmt.Errorf("parsing cancelled: %w", err)

Assessment: These are appropriate uses of fmt.Errorf for wrapping context cancellation errors, not parsing errors. This is correct Go error handling practice.

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

Missing coverage:

Full error code propagation chain (parser → CLI → LSP)
Edge cases in configuration validation
Concurrent tokenizer usage with DoS limits

4. Performance Optimizations ⭐

Minor optimizations:

extractErrorCode() could cache results for repeated calls
Config validation could be cached after first successful validation

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Excellent design with proper separation of concerns. The multiple loading strategies and merge functionality are well-implemented.

Specific feedback:

DefaultConfig() provides sensible defaults (pkg/config/config.go:97-140)
Validate() is comprehensive and covers edge cases (pkg/config/config.go:143-217)
Environment variable handling is robust (pkg/config/loader.go:89-232)
LSP integration functions are well-designed (pkg/config/lsp.go)

Error Handling System

Outstanding implementation with proper error categorization and user-friendly messages.

Specific feedback:

Error codes follow clear patterns (E1xxx tokenizer, E2xxx parser, etc.)
Location tracking is accurate
CLI integration properly extracts and displays codes (cmd/gosqlx/internal/output/json.go:277-302)
LSP integration shows error codes in VS Code Problems panel (pkg/lsp/handler.go:631-648)

Testing Infrastructure

Strong improvements especially for LSP and config packages.

Benchmarks are particularly well-designed:

handler_bench_test.go: 21+ benchmarks covering key operations
scanner_bench_test.go: 16 benchmarks for security scanner
Proper allocation tracking with b.ReportAllocs()

🚨 Security Review

✅ No security concerns found. The PR:

Adds DoS protection without removing existing safeguards
Implements proper input validation
Uses structured error handling that doesn't leak sensitive info
Follows defensive programming practices

📊 Architecture Assessment

The architectural changes are well-designed and production-ready:

Modular design with clear package boundaries
Backwards compatibility maintained
Performance optimizations don't compromise safety
Error handling is comprehensive and user-friendly
Configuration system supports multiple deployment scenarios

📝 Documentation Review

Strong improvements to documentation:

docs/ERROR_CODES.md: Comprehensive with examples and solutions
docs/CLI_GUIDE.md: Added missing commands
docs/API_REFERENCE.md: Updated with new functions

🎯 Recommendations

Consider: Add integration tests for full error propagation chain
Enhancement: Caching optimizations for config validation and error code extraction
Future: More comprehensive concurrency testing for tokenizer DoS limits

✅ Final Assessment

This is a high-quality architectural improvement that significantly enhances:

Error handling and debugging capabilities
Configuration management flexibility
Testing infrastructure and reliability
Developer experience

The changes are well-implemented, thoroughly tested, and maintain production stability. The boolean merging approach using pointer types is the correct design pattern for layered configuration.

Recommendation: Approve - This PR represents solid architectural improvements with no blocking issues. The noted observations are either correct design decisions or minor enhancements for future consideration.

docs: update issue reference to #134 in config mergeInto comment

9932cd2

fix: remove unused error type check in fuzz test (SA4006)

2420f05

ajitpratap0 merged commit e1d01c2 into main Nov 27, 2025
16 checks passed

ajitpratap0 mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2025

perf: add caching for keyword suggestions and config loading #136

Merged

5 tasks

ajitpratap0 mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2025

docs: v1.6.0 Release Documentation - Comprehensive Changelog & README Updates #184

Merged

4 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

feat: comprehensive architecture improvements for error handling, testing, and configuration #133

feat: comprehensive architecture improvements for error handling, testing, and configuration #133

Uh oh!

ajitpratap0 commented Nov 27, 2025

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

ajitpratap0 commented Nov 27, 2025

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

feat: comprehensive architecture improvements for error handling, testing, and configuration #133

feat: comprehensive architecture improvements for error handling, testing, and configuration #133

Uh oh!

Conversation

ajitpratap0 commented Nov 27, 2025

Summary

Key Improvements

Changes Made

1. Structured Error Codes System

2. CLI Enhancement (cmd/gosqlx/internal/output/json.go)

3. LSP Integration (pkg/lsp/handler.go)

4. Unified Configuration Package (pkg/config/)

5. Testing Improvements

6. Documentation Updates

Error Code Reference

Test Plan

Files Changed

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

Review Tasks:

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

4. Strong Security Practices

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (pkg/config/)

Error Handling System

Testing Infrastructure

🚨 Security Review

📊 Architecture Assessment

📝 Documentation Review

🎯 Recommendations

✅ Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

Review Tasks:

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

4. Strong Security Practices

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

🔍 Detailed Code Review

Configuration Package (pkg/config/)

Error Handling System

Testing Infrastructure

🚨 Security Review

📊 Architecture Assessment

📝 Documentation Review

🎯 Recommendations

✅ Final Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: Comprehensive Architecture Improvements

Review Tasks:

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structured Error System

2. Robust Configuration Architecture

3. Comprehensive Testing Improvements

4. Strong Security Practices

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

1. Boolean Field Merging Logic ⭐⭐⭐

2. Error Code Consistency ⭐⭐

3. Test Coverage Gaps ⭐⭐

4. Performance Considerations ⭐

2. CLI Enhancement (`cmd/gosqlx/internal/output/json.go`)

3. LSP Integration (`pkg/lsp/handler.go`)

4. Unified Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

Fixed in commits `5cb30dc` and `9932cd2`:

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)

claude bot commented Nov 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Configuration Package (`pkg/config/`)