docs: alphabetize hidden_toctree.rst entries

[athreesh]

Summary

Reordered all documentation entries in docs/hidden_toctree.rst alphabetically for better organization and maintainability.

Changes

• Sorted all documentation file paths in the hidden toctree alphabetically
• No functional changes, only reorganization for easier navigation and maintenance

Test plan

• Verified all file paths remain valid
• Confirmed documentation structure is unchanged
• Only ordering has been modified

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Reorganized documentation structure for improved navigation and discoverability.
  • Added comprehensive new sections covering frontends, API references, observability metrics, deployment documentation, and infrastructure guides.
  • Updated and consolidated backend configuration, design documentation, and related resources across the documentation suite.

[copy-pr-bot]

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request reorganizes the hidden toctree in documentation, removing legacy entries for Kubernetes, observability, and examples while adding new sections for frontends, tool-calling, APIs, backends, and design documentation. The change restructures which documentation is indexed in the hidden tree.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation structure reorganization docs/hidden_toctree.rst	Substantial reorganization: removes Kubernetes, kvbm, observability, backends, design docs, examples, and runtime entries; adds frontends, tool-calling, API references, and backend-specific documentation sections; expands and consolidates documentation tree indexing.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

• Verify all newly referenced documentation files exist at their specified paths
• Confirm removed entries are truly obsolete or relocated elsewhere
• Check that the reorganized structure maintains logical coherence across frontend, backend, API, and design sections

Poem

🐰 Hop along the doc-tree's winding way,
Old paths cleared, new branches hold their sway,
Frontends dance where backends used to play,
APIs gleam in tidy disarray,
A rabbit's work—reorganized today! ✨

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: alphabetizing entries in the hidden_toctree.rst file as a reorganization effort.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers the main changes and test plan, but lacks some template sections (Overview, Where to start, Related Issues) and is somewhat generic without specific file path examples.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 684107c and a46dc3d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/hidden_toctree.rst (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Build and Test - dynamo

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/hidden_toctree.rst (2)

14-72: All referenced documentation files exist in the repository.

Verification confirms that all 60+ file paths in the toctree are valid and the referenced documentation files are present. No missing files detected.

---

1-73: Original review comment is based on contradictory information that verification has now resolved.

Verification confirms the PR description is accurate: this is a purely organizational change with entries sorted alphabetically. No entries were added or removed. The AI-generated summary claiming "substantial removal" and "adding new sections" was incorrect. The discrepancy the review flagged has been resolved—there is no actual inconsistency between the PR objectives and the code changes.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[athreesh]

@harryskim All engines (SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, vLLM) have been reordered alphabetically across all documentation files and the hidden_toctree.rst. Ready for review!