Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v8.0.0 #462

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

v8.0.0 #462

merged 14 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

khaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@khaf khaf commented Jan 17, 2025

  • New Features

    • CLIENT-3257 Implement iterator support for Recordset.
  • Fixes

    • CLIENT-3275 Return an error when Transaction commit called, but transaction was already aborted.
    • CLIENT-3295 Duplicate parsing of fields in RecordParser.ParseRecord.
    • CLIENT-3261 New OnLockingOnly attribute for various write policies to write only if provisional does not exist.
    • CLIENT-3227 Clarify that BasePolicy.UseCompression requires Enterprise Edition.
    • CLIENT-3260 Add MRT_ALREADY_LOCKED and MRT_MONITOR_EXISTS error codes.
    • [CLIENT-3292][CLIENT-3293] Update dependencies due to Snyk CVE reports.
    • CLIENT-3274 Fix Transaction related client exception inconsistency between clients.
    • CLIENT-3207 Do not close/delete Transaction monitor record on abort/commit when a write command in that Transaction fails and is inDoubt.
    • CLIENT-3283 Remove the txn instance from the copied write policy when adding Transaction monitor keys.
    • CLIENT-3270 Normalize API reference language with server 8.0 site docs.
    • [CLIENT-3258] Transaction commit returns 'Failed to commit one or more record versions' error.

@khaf khaf changed the title v8.0.0-beta.3 v8.0.0 Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

@justinlee-aerospike justinlee-aerospike left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes look good

@khaf khaf merged commit 310ed26 into v8 Jan 22, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants