feat: actor concepts #941
Open
feat: actor concepts #941
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
niermann999
force-pushed
the
feat-actor-concepts
branch
from
d055149 to
8de46d6
Compare
niermann999
force-pushed
the
feat-actor-concepts
branch
from
8de46d6 to
47824e3
Compare
niermann999
force-pushed
the
feat-actor-concepts
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9012f36 to
eadf990
Compare
niermann999
force-pushed
the
feat-actor-concepts
branch
from
eadf990 to
eaca4eb
Compare
niermann999
force-pushed
the
feat-actor-concepts
branch
from
eaca4eb to
415c9f5
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a few very basic concepts for actors in detray. Due to dependencies on the
detray::actortype, I had to separate the headers of the base actor and composite actor. In order to add requirements on the call operators of the actors, the propagator state would also have to be moved to its own header instead of being a nested struct. But that is for a later PR perhaps