Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S2PatternLikelihood cut for SR2 DEC analysis #195

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

a1exndr
Copy link
Contributor

@a1exndr a1exndr commented Sep 28, 2020

An updated version of the S2PatternLikelihood cut is proposed for the SR2 DEC analysis, based on the results presented in the following note:
https://xe1t-wiki.lngs.infn.it/doku.php?id=xenon:xenon1t:dec:s2patternlikelihoodsr2dec
The cut has been reviewed and approved by @skazama :
https://xe1t-wiki.lngs.infn.it/doku.php?id=xenon:xenon1t:wittweg:dec_extended_s2patternlikelihood_shingo_review

@jpienaar13
Copy link

@a1exndr Did you test this on your lcoal version of lax? Does it work as intended?

@chiaracapelli. @cwittweg and @skazama Can you approve the PR?

@a1exndr
Copy link
Contributor Author

a1exndr commented Oct 1, 2020

@jpienaar13 Yes, I'm successfully working with it with the lax installation (Pax v6.10.1, Hax v2.5.0 and Lax v1.7.2) on dali.

Copy link

@cwittweg cwittweg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should move the parameter files to LAX or a central directory instead of having them in a personal directory (lines 301, 302).

Copy link

@cwittweg cwittweg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, nevermind. This has also been done for other cuts. I have a feeling we should do this differently for XENONnT, but it seems to be the method of choice for XENON1T.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants