Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System requirements and architecture patterns #582

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

jeromehardaway
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request includes a new blog post titled "Leveraging Prompt Engineering in Software Development: System Requirements & Architecture Patterns with JavaScript, TypeScript, Next.js, Vue, and Angular". The blog post discusses the concept of prompt engineering in software development, with a focus on design techniques, patterns, and strategies. It discusses in detail eight different patterns: Requirements Simulator Pattern, Specification Disambiguation Pattern, API Generator Pattern, API Simulator Pattern, Few-shot Code Example Generation Pattern, Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Creation Pattern, Architectural Possibilities Pattern, and Change Request Simulation Pattern. Each pattern is explained with examples across different technologies including JavaScript, TypeScript, Next.js, Vue, and Angular. The blog post ends with a call to action for supporting #VetsWhoCode.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 26, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
vets-who-code-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 26, 2024 4:15pm

@jeromehardaway jeromehardaway self-assigned this Mar 26, 2024
@jeromehardaway jeromehardaway merged commit 65cda9b into master Mar 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@jeromehardaway jeromehardaway deleted the SystemRequirementsAndArchitecturePatterns branch March 26, 2024 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant