Skip to content

doc: documenting the boot protocol#74

Open
dpsmith wants to merge 1 commit into
TrenchBoot:masterfrom
dpsmith:boot-protocol
Open

doc: documenting the boot protocol#74
dpsmith wants to merge 1 commit into
TrenchBoot:masterfrom
dpsmith:boot-protocol

Conversation

@dpsmith
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@dpsmith dpsmith commented Aug 1, 2021

This is an attempt to formalize the boot protocol while also proposing
a new name for this implementation of the Secure Loader for SKINIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith dpsmith@apertussolutions.com

Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/boot_protocol.rst Outdated
This is an attempt to formalize the boot protocol while also proposing
a new name for this implementation of the Secure Loader for SKINIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
@dpsmith
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

dpsmith commented Aug 5, 2021

I have trimmed out the implementation details, addressed the comments, and made a few small expansions. I have pushed the changes to the boot protocol doc and have the implementation details in an in progress document. Even if everyone agrees with this revision, I would like to hold this PR until I can get the implementation document done so that we can ensure they are aligned with each other before merging.

@macpijan macpijan removed their request for review September 26, 2022 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants