-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3l fwd #452
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Brent R. Yates <[email protected]>
@@ -721,6 +721,10 @@ def process(self, events): | |||
preselections.add("2lss_fwd", (events.is2l & pass_trg & fwdjet_mask)) | |||
preselections.add("2l_fwd_p", (chargel0_p & fwdjet_mask)) | |||
preselections.add("2l_fwd_m", (chargel0_m & fwdjet_mask)) | |||
preselections.add("3l_fwd", (events.is3l & pass_trg)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bryates This is perhaps a minor thing. I see that you include the fwdjet_mask
in ch_lst_test.json
instead of in the 3l_fwd
mask in the processor. But 2lss_fwd fwdjet_mask
does the other way. Do we want to keep the selection codes for 2lss_fwd and 3l_fwd more consistent just to be easier for others to read/understand?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great catch. Let's move it to the json file for 2lss
, that way keep the processor a bit more generalized.
@@ -32,15 +32,15 @@ def __init__(self, samples): | |||
jeta_axis = hist.axis.Regular(25, -2.5, 2.5, name="eta", label=r"Jet \eta (GeV)") | |||
jaeta_axis = hist.axis.Variable([0, 1, 1.8, 2.4], name="abseta", label=r"Jet \eta (GeV)") | |||
Flav_axis = hist.axis.StrCategory([], name="Flav", growth=True) | |||
flav_axis = hist.axis.IntCategory([], name="flav", growth=True) | |||
flav_axis = hist.axis.Regular(5, 0, 5, name="flav", label="jet flav") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ywan2 did you push these change by accident?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These I pushed by accident. Sorry about it! Although it does fix the script to run, but I think I will make these changes in another branch to avoid confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Sounds like a good plan.
If you check the |
Ok thanks for confirming. |
Adding new 3l forward jet regions, as talked about in the last meeting. Most of this will isolate the extra parton in the ttW process, but the new 1 jet forward region is designed to isolate the single-top spectator quark.