SVG Support

[shaunpatterson]

Incorporates #22

Added a few extra tests for more code coverage

[TimBeyer]

Hey, thanks a lot for the extended PR.
What I'm really missing to finally merge the SVG support is to follow the more modular structure I introduced in #21

Currently the SVG handling is kind of a regression code-wise, at the same time leaving the modules lying around as orphaned code.

Once that is taken care of I'll gladly merge this.

[TimBeyer]

Hey @spattersongt, sorry I never got back to you.
To be honest, I just never noticed you pushed some additional commits.

I promise I'll review this in the coming days.
Your contribution is much appreciated :)

[feelic]

This would be awesome to have, is there anything I could do to help with it ?

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-5.2%) to 94.764% when pulling 0a4d5ec on spattersongt:master into 42c1229 on TimBeyer:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-5.2%) to 94.764% when pulling 0a4d5ec on spattersongt:master into 42c1229 on TimBeyer:master.

[Jarred-Sumner]

Something I'm working on depends on inline SVG support, and I'd love to use this library. What are the next steps on this PR?

[jxm262]

👍 Chiming in along with the other commenters, is there any plans to merge this? Or if there's still specific issues with the PR, is there anything I can do to help?

For the meantime I'm going to use the fork from @shaunpatterson

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling e65af81 on shaunpatterson:master into 42c1229 on TimBeyer:master.