-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
Support groupBy over BigInt and Date
#1091
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kevin-dp
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
kevin/group-by-bigint-or-date
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+367
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
564d069
Reproduce problem with groupBy over BigInt
kevin-dp b590c96
Fix queries in tests
kevin-dp ae32368
ci: apply automated fixes
autofix-ci[bot] 00720dd
Properly serialize BigInt and Date in groupBy operator
kevin-dp b8c486d
ci: apply automated fixes
autofix-ci[bot] 7aba950
Replace hardcoded BigInt values with Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER expressi…
Copilot d763ef3
ci: apply automated fixes
autofix-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new
serializeValueutility function lacks unit tests in the db-ivm package. While integration tests exist in the db package, consider adding unit tests inpackages/db-ivm/tests/utils.test.tsto verify edge cases like null values, undefined values, nested objects with BigInt/Date, arrays containing BigInt/Date, and mixed types. This would improve maintainability and ensure the function behaves correctly in isolation.