Skip to content

gccrs: Remove old hack from resolve operator overload #4180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2025
Merged

gccrs: Remove old hack from resolve operator overload #4180

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 0 additions & 18 deletions gcc/rust/typecheck/rust-hir-type-check-expr.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2034,24 +2034,6 @@ TypeCheckExpr::resolve_operator_overload (
rust_debug ("is_impl_item_candidate: %s",
resolved_candidate.is_impl_candidate () ? "true" : "false");

if (resolved_candidate.is_impl_candidate ())
{
auto infer_arguments = TyTy::SubstitutionArgumentMappings::error ();
HIR::ImplBlock &impl = *resolved_candidate.item.impl.parent;
TyTy::BaseType *impl_self_infer
= TypeCheckItem::ResolveImplBlockSelfWithInference (impl,
expr.get_locus (),
&infer_arguments);
if (impl_self_infer->get_kind () == TyTy::TypeKind::ERROR)
{
return false;
}
if (!infer_arguments.is_empty ())
{
lookup = SubstMapperInternal::Resolve (lookup, infer_arguments);
}
}

// in the case where we resolve to a trait bound we have to be careful we are
// able to do so there is a case where we are currently resolving the deref
// operator overload function which is generic and this might resolve to the
Expand Down
Loading