You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I set a demo that contains:
some VertexSBAPointXYZ vertex (landmarks)
some VertexSE3Expmap vertex (camera pose)
and some EdgeStereoSE3ProjectXYZ edge (the observation that connects the two types of vertexes above)
While I find out if I just add ONE VertexSE3Expmap to the optimizer, there will be a runtime error like the below:
In principle yes. The assert here guards memory allocation that otherwise would allocate zero elements.
Potentially, the Schur complement implementation can be refactored to allow for 0 poses as well.
Hi gusy,
I set a demo that contains:
some VertexSBAPointXYZ vertex (landmarks)
some VertexSE3Expmap vertex (camera pose)
and some EdgeStereoSE3ProjectXYZ edge (the observation that connects the two types of vertexes above)
While I find out if I just add ONE VertexSE3Expmap to the optimizer, there will be a runtime error like the below:
When I increase the VertexSE3Expmap to TWO and more, the g2o works fine.
Theroyicaly that I could optimize only one camera pose right?
So it might be because I used the wrong type of vertex?
any idea or tips for this?
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: