Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mutual Information I(𝒶, 𝒷) and improving doctests/documentation in entanglement.jl #338

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/QuantumClifford.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ export
# Group theory tools
groupify, minimal_generating_set, pauligroup, normalizer, centralizer, contractor, delete_columns,
# Clipped Gauge
canonicalize_clip!, bigram, entanglement_entropy,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's not export it as this is something we would want to synchronize with QuantumInterface

Could you post an issue at https://github.com/qojulia/QuantumInterface.jl/ describing the need for a new generic function and referencing this PR. The goal would be to pick a name that can be reused by other packages.

In the meantime, keeping this unexported will let us merge this PR without waiting for that coordination.

canonicalize_clip!, bigram, entanglement_entropy, mutual_information,
# mctrajectories
CircuitStatus, continue_stat, true_success_stat, false_success_stat, failure_stat,
mctrajectory!, mctrajectories, applywstatus!,
Expand Down
114 changes: 111 additions & 3 deletions src/entanglement.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -132,15 +132,41 @@ end
"""
$TYPEDSIGNATURES

Get the bigram of a tableau.
The Bigram `B` of stabilizer endpoints represents the "span" of each stabilizer within a set of Pauli operators `𝒢 = {g₁,…,gₙ}`.

It is the list of endpoints of a tableau in the clipped gauge.
For each stabilizer `g`, the left endpoint `𝓁(g)` is defined as the minimum site `x` where `g` acts non-trivially, while the
right endpoint `𝓇(g)` is the maximum site where `g` acts non-trivially.

The site `x` represent the position within the system, taking values from `{1,2,…,n}` where `n` is the number of qubits.

The bigram set `B(𝒢)` encodes these endpoints as pairs:

`B(𝒢) ≡ {(𝓁(g₁),𝓇(g₁)),…,(𝓁(gₙ),𝓇(gₙ))}`

The clipped gauge `𝒢` is a specific choice of stabilizer state where exactly two stabilizer endpoints exist at each site,
ensuring `ρₗ(x) + ρᵣ(x) = 2` for all sites `x` where `ρ` represents the reduced density matrix for the subsystem under
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That sentence is unclear to me. How can two density matrices sum up to be the scalar 2?

consideration.

In the clipped gauge, entanglement entropy is determined only by the stabilizers' endpoints, regardless of their internal structure.

If `clip=true` (the default) the tableau is converted to the clipped gauge in-place before calculating the bigram.
Otherwise, the clip gauge conversion is skipped (for cases where the input is already known to be in the correct gauge).

Introduced in [nahum2017quantum](@cite), with a more detailed explanation of the algorithm in [li2019measurement](@cite) and [gullans2021quantum](@cite).

```jldoctest
julia> s = ghz(3)
+ XXX
+ ZZ_
+ _ZZ

julia> bigram(s)
3×2 Matrix{Int64}:
1 3
1 2
2 3
```

See also: [`canonicalize_clip!`](@ref)
"""
function bigram(state::AbstractStabilizer; clip::Bool=true)::Matrix{Int} # JET-XXX The ::Matrix{Int} should not be necessary, but they help with inference
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -171,15 +197,40 @@ the most performant one depending on the particular case.

Currently implemented are the `:clip` (clipped gauge), `:graph` (graph state), and `:rref` (Gaussian elimination) algorithms.
Benchmark your particular case to choose the best one.

See Appendix C of [nahum2017quantum](@cite).
"""
function entanglement_entropy end


"""
$TYPEDSIGNATURES

Get bipartite entanglement entropy of a contiguous subsystem by passing through the clipped gauge.

If `clip=false` is set the canonicalization step is skipped, useful if the input state is already in the clipped gauge.

```jldoctest
julia> using Graphs # hide

julia> s = ghz(3)
+ XXX
+ ZZ_
+ _ZZ

julia> entanglement_entropy(s, 1:3, Val(:clip))
0

julia> s = Stabilizer(Graph(ghz(4)))
+ XZZZ
+ ZX__
+ Z_X_
+ Z__X

julia> entanglement_entropy(s, [1,4], Val(:graph))
1
```

See also: [`bigram`](@ref), [`canonicalize_clip!`](@ref)
"""
function entanglement_entropy(state::AbstractStabilizer, subsystem_range::UnitRange, algorithm::Val{:clip}; clip::Bool=true)
Expand All @@ -193,6 +244,8 @@ end


"""
$TYPEDSIGNATURES

Get bipartite entanglement entropy by first converting the state to a graph and computing the rank of the adjacency matrix.

Based on "Entanglement in graph states and its applications".
Expand All @@ -207,11 +260,13 @@ end


"""
$TYPEDSIGNATURES

Get bipartite entanglement entropy by converting to RREF form (i.e., partial trace form).

The state will be partially canonicalized in an RREF form.

See also: [`canonicalize_rref!`](@ref), [`traceout!`](@ref).
See also: [`canonicalize_rref!`](@ref), [`traceout!`](@ref), [`mutual_information`](@ref)
"""
function entanglement_entropy(state::AbstractStabilizer, subsystem::AbstractVector, algorithm::Val{:rref}; pure::Bool=false)
nb_of_qubits = nqubits(state)
Expand All @@ -228,3 +283,56 @@ function entanglement_entropy(state::AbstractStabilizer, subsystem::AbstractVect
end

entanglement_entropy(state::MixedDestabilizer, subsystem::AbstractVector, a::Val{:rref}) = entanglement_entropy(state, subsystem, a; pure=nqubits(state)==rank(state))

"""
$TYPEDSIGNATURES

The mutual information between subsystems `𝒶` and `𝒷` in a stabilizer state is given by `I(𝒶, 𝒷) = S𝒶 + S𝒷 - S𝒶𝒷`.

```jldoctest
julia> using Graphs # hide

julia> mutual_information(ghz(3), 1:2, 3:4, Val(:clip))
2

julia> s = Stabilizer(Graph(ghz(4)))
+ XZZZ
+ ZX__
+ Z_X_
+ Z__X

julia> mutual_information(s, [1,2], [3, 4], Val(:graph))
2
```

See Eq. E6 of [li2019measurement](@cite). See also: [`entanglement_entropy`](@ref)
"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should probably be a docstring for a function declaration function mutual_information end, and not be attached to a specific method. Or probably even better if there is a method with some default choice of algorithm (that way it will not cause issues when this gets declared in QuantumInterface).

function mutual_information(state::AbstractStabilizer, A::UnitRange, B::UnitRange, algorithm::Val{:clip}; clip::Bool=true)
if !isempty(intersect(A, B))
throw(ArgumentError("Ranges A and B must not overlap."))
end
S𝒶 = entanglement_entropy(state, A, algorithm; clip=clip)
S𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, B, algorithm; clip=clip)
S𝒶𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, UnitRange(first(union(A, B)), last(union(A, B))), algorithm; clip=clip)
return S𝒶 + S𝒷 - S𝒶𝒷
end

function mutual_information(state::AbstractStabilizer, A::AbstractVector, B::AbstractVector, algorithm::Val{:rref}; pure::Bool=false)
if !isempty(intersect(A, B))
throw(ArgumentError("Ranges A and B must not overlap."))
end
S𝒶 = entanglement_entropy(state, A, algorithm; pure=pure)
S𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, B, algorithm; pure=pure)
S𝒶𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, union(A, B), algorithm; pure=pure)
return S𝒶 + S𝒷 - S𝒶𝒷
end

function mutual_information(state::AbstractStabilizer, A::AbstractVector, B::AbstractVector, algorithm::Val{:graph})
if !isempty(intersect(A, B))
throw(ArgumentError("Ranges A and B must not overlap."))
end
S𝒶 = entanglement_entropy(state, A, algorithm)
S𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, B, algorithm)
S𝒶𝒷 = entanglement_entropy(state, union(A, B), algorithm)
return S𝒶 + S𝒷 - S𝒶𝒷
end
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions test/test_entanglement.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,4 +50,24 @@
@test entanglement_entropy(copy(s), subsystem, Val(:graph))==2
@test entanglement_entropy(copy(s), subsystem, Val(:rref))==2
end

@testset "Mutual information for Clifford circuits" begin
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

additional tests that use QuantumOptics to double check the results independently would be very valuable

for n in test_sizes
s = random_stabilizer(n)
endpointsA = sort(rand(1:n, 2))
subsystem_rangeA = endpointsA[1]:endpointsA[2]
startB = rand(subsystem_rangeA)
endB = rand(startB:n)
subsystem_rangeB = startB:endB
if !isempty(intersect(subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB))
@test_throws ArgumentError mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:clip))
@test_throws ArgumentError mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:rref))
@test_throws ArgumentError mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:graph))
else
@test mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:clip)) == mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:rref)) == mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:graph))
# The mutual information `I(𝒶, 𝒷) = S𝒶 + S𝒷 - S𝒶𝒷 for Clifford circuits is non-negative [li2019measurement](@cite).
@test mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:clip)) & mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:rref)) & mutual_information(copy(s), subsystem_rangeA, subsystem_rangeB, Val(:graph)) >= 0
end
end
end
end
Loading