Skip to content

Conversation

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #274 :
Add the new required text fields (December 2015 release of the material design spec)

`--paper-input-container-color` | Label and underline color when the input is not focused | `--secondary-text-color`
`--paper-input-container-focus-color` | Label and underline color when the input is focused | `--primary-color`
`--paper-input-container-invalid-color` | Label and underline color when the input is is invalid | `--error-color`
`--paper-input-container-required-color` | Color used for the asterix displayed for required input | `--error-color`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure there's a need for this. From the mocks, the * is the same color as the error color, and I don't think there's a need for that to be different.

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@notwaldorf I took into account your remark and squashed the commit!

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@notwaldorf friendly ping! :)

@florent1933
Copy link

I love this PR. Good job @MeTaNoV 👍

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thx @florent1933 , somehow get lost... @notwaldorf is paper-input still under focus?

@florent1933
Copy link

Maybe not...

@notwaldorf
Copy link
Contributor

notwaldorf commented Dec 19, 2016

paper-input is still under focus, but this PR can't be merged because it needs a rebase. Secondly, in its current form, I am not super convinced it's not a breaking change to the 1.0 version, so I'm not sure it can even be merged in 1.0

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@notwaldorf this means I have to work a bit for Polymer Team? I have busy with Machine Learning @ Google right now.... Next week, maybe... Thanks for the follow-up BTW!!

@GeoloeG-IsT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@notwaldorf shall I rebase for 2.0?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants