Current function cell #32
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mariaKt
force-pushed
the
current-function
branch
from
5fc7318 to
62a7003
Compare
dwightguth
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
src/expression.md
Outdated
| @@ -6,15 +6,22 @@ module SOLIDITY-EXPRESSION | |||
| imports SOLIDITY-CONFIGURATION | |||
| imports INT | |||
|
|
|||
| syntax Id ::= "contractInit" [token] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please use the existing "constructor" token we use for this purpose.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a cell that tracks the name of the function whose body is at the top of the K cell.
I added a
contractInitId used when the contract initialization code is running, because it is not technically in the body of the constructor.However, I am not certain that there is a reason to separate the initialization from the constructor, in that there will never be a branch (constructor will always follow the initialization code, if any). So, I could eliminate
contractInitentirely, and change the current function name to constructor immediately before the initialization code. Let me know what you think.