Skip to content

Conversation

sowelipililimute
Copy link
Contributor

This makes the content more immediately accessible and easier to browse through. Styling has also been adjusted as necessary to accomodate a flatter hierarchy of items; presenting content as a list with headers instead of a grid of cards.

ATM, the hierarchy of other stuff isn't flattened; I can do that if y'all like how it looks on the Paper dev pages.

before after

@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from d0d4315 to fc96bfc Compare April 21, 2024 18:31
Copy link
Member

@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In addition to the Doc Cards being weird on main admin/dev/contrib pages, I find it weird that the "Welcome to the paper docs" at the top of sidebars have a doc icon as well. Overall, I am a fan of the style though! thanks

@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from fc96bfc to 08edcc8 Compare April 22, 2024 02:35
@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from 08edcc8 to 96a61a4 Compare April 22, 2024 02:37
@sowelipililimute
Copy link
Contributor Author

In addition to the Doc Cards being weird on main admin/dev/contrib pages, I find it weird that the "Welcome to the paper docs" at the top of sidebars have a doc icon as well. Overall, I am a fan of the style though! thanks

fixed this

@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from 96a61a4 to 0ca1ecc Compare April 22, 2024 02:37
@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from 0ca1ecc to 9547695 Compare April 23, 2024 01:39
@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n self-assigned this May 4, 2024
@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n self-requested a review May 4, 2024 12:56
@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n added type: feature New feature or request status: accepted This issue has been accepted labels May 4, 2024
@olijeffers0n
Copy link
Member

Could this be updated? If you are not able to, do not worry.

@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch 2 times, most recently from 507955c to 4a4bccd Compare August 3, 2024 15:19
This makes the content more immediately accessible and easier to browse through.
Styling has also been adjusted as necessary to accomodate a flatter hierarchy of items;
presenting content as a list with headers instead of a grid of cards.
@sowelipililimute sowelipililimute force-pushed the work/jblackquill/better-listings branch from 4a4bccd to de15a07 Compare August 12, 2024 03:32
Copy link
Member

@olijeffers0n olijeffers0n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved from a technical and feature POV. Help wanted for if this is better than the current sidebar

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 28, 2024

built with Refined Cloudflare Pages Action

⚡ Cloudflare Pages Deployment

Name Status Preview Last Commit
papermc-docs ✅ Ready (View Log) Visit Preview c830a3b

@Machine-Maker
Copy link
Member

Looks good. I still want to do the thing where the "Development", "Admin" things are on the top of the page and you change between projects by the logo/project name however.

But this still works with that, making the whole sidebar just development

@zlataovce
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure if the sidebar icons add any value to the navigation experience, it just seems like visual clutter to me; maybe make them a little smaller and darker (to make the page/section names stand out more)?

visual bug when page names are wrapped (icons are shrunk)
image

light mode makes the sidebar icons blend in with the background completely

@zlataovce
Copy link
Member

superseded by #560

@zlataovce zlataovce closed this Apr 19, 2025
sowelipililimute pushed a commit to sowelipililimute/docs that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status: accepted This issue has been accepted type: feature New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants