docs: use canonical PackedUserOperation field names

[GarmashAlex]

Replace shorthand field names in documentation comments with the canonical names defined by the ERC-4337 interface:

• verificationGas → verificationGasLimit
• callGas → callGasLimit
• maxPriorityFee → maxPriorityFeePerGas

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: fbe98c6

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation updates to the account abstraction module clarify field naming in PackedUserOperation. Comments are modified to reference the exact component field names: accountGasLimits is updated to reference verificationGasLimit and callGasLimit, and gasFees is updated to reference maxPriorityFeePerGas and maxFeePerGas. Changes are limited to documentation only with no modifications to code or type definitions.

Suggested labels

typo

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "docs: use canonical PackedUserOperation field names" directly and clearly summarizes the main change in the pull request. According to the raw summary, the changeset updates comments in PackedUserOperation fields to reflect exact canonical field names as defined by the ERC-4337 interface, which is precisely what the title conveys. The title is specific, concise, and a developer scanning the repository history would immediately understand the primary change without ambiguity.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description is clearly related to the changeset and provides specific information about the changes. It explains the intent to replace shorthand field names with canonical names defined by the ERC-4337 interface, and lists concrete examples of the mappings (verificationGas → verificationGasLimit, callGas → callGasLimit, maxPriorityFee → maxPriorityFeePerGas). This directly aligns with the documentation updates described in the raw summary and is neither vague nor off-topic.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8631702 and fbe98c6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/modules/ROOT/pages/account-abstraction.adoc (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)

• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: slither
• GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
• GitHub Check: halmos
• GitHub Check: tests-foundry
• GitHub Check: tests
• GitHub Check: coverage

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/modules/ROOT/pages/account-abstraction.adoc (1)

21-23: Documentation correctly aligns with EIP-4337 specification.

The field name updates in the PackedUserOperation comments are accurate. The accountGasLimits field correctly decomposes into verificationGasLimit (16 bytes) and callGasLimit (16 bytes), and gasFees correctly decomposes into maxPriorityFeePerGas (16 bytes) and maxFeePerGas (16 bytes), matching the canonical ERC-4337 specification. The documentation now precisely reflects how packed components decompose, improving clarity for developers.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ernestognw]

Thanks

[marshalokos]

Approved