Skip to content

Conversation

@arr00
Copy link
Contributor

@arr00 arr00 commented Dec 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved interface compatibility for the ERC20 token wrapper to ensure proper standards compliance.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@arr00 arr00 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2025 21:22
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Deploy Preview for confidential-tokens ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a4e986f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/confidential-tokens/deploys/69334d2e70fab9000884dbea
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-267--confidential-tokens.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Walkthrough

Added a supportsInterface method override to the ERC7984ERC20Wrapper contract that returns true for the wrapper's own interface ID and delegates other interface queries to its superclass implementation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Interface Detection Override
contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol
Added public view supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) override that checks if the queried interface ID matches the wrapper's own interface and defers to superclass for other IDs

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5–10 minutes

  • Verify that the wrapper's interface ID is correctly identified and returned
  • Confirm proper delegation to superclass supportsInterface for non-matching interface IDs
  • Check that the override signature aligns with EIP-165 and parent class expectations

Poem

🐰 A wrapper so clever, now speaks for itself,
Detecting its interface with proper finesse—
What am I? it whispers, then defers with good grace,
To ancestors wiser in protocol's place.
Hopping through standards, one method at a time!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Expose additional interface id in wrapper' accurately describes the main change: adding a supportsInterface override in ERC7984ERC20Wrapper to expose the wrapper's interface ID.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/wrapper-165-id

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol (1)

66-69: Align supportsInterface with the ERC7984Rwa pattern and fix NatSpec.

The supportsInterface implementation should follow the established pattern in ERC7984Rwa and the base ERC7984 contract:

  1. NatSpec correction (line 66): Change /// inheritdoc IERC165 to /// @inheritdoc ERC165 (missing @ prefix and incorrect interface reference).

  2. Pattern consistency (line 68): To expose a wrapper-specific ERC-165 interface ID idiomatically, introduce an IERC7984ERC20Wrapper interface describing the wrapper's public API, have this contract implement it, and use type(IERC7984ERC20Wrapper).interfaceId instead. This mirrors the approach used in ERC7984Rwa with IERC7984Rwa and makes the intent explicit.

Once IERC7984ERC20Wrapper exists:

-    /// inheritdoc IERC165
+    /// @inheritdoc ERC165
     function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view virtual override(ERC7984) returns (bool) {
-        return interfaceId == type(ERC7984ERC20Wrapper).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId);
+        return interfaceId == type(IERC7984ERC20Wrapper).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId);
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4824aa4 and a4e986f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • contracts/token/ERC7984/extensions/ERC7984ERC20Wrapper.sol (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: boostsecurity - boostsecurityio/semgrep-pro
  • GitHub Check: coverage
  • GitHub Check: slither
  • GitHub Check: tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants