-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clojure: 1.10.1.645 -> 1.10.1.727 #102272
clojure: 1.10.1.645 -> 1.10.1.727 #102272
Conversation
Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here. |
Result of 2 packages built:
|
Result of 1 package failed to build:
1 package built:
|
Could this be a problem with Mac OS Catalina? I see reports about that by googling for that error. |
Could be. We can also disable it for darwin for now. |
Okay. That would have to be a different PR, because the lumo problem is not a clojure problem, AFAICS. |
Reminder: Please review! This Pull Request is awaiting review. If you are the assigned reviewer, please have a look. Try to find another reviewer if necessary. If you can't, please say so. If the status is not accurate, please change it. If nothing happens, this PR will be put back in the |
I agree, lumo issues have nothing to do with this PR. I think we should remove lumo from nixpkgs at some point (it was removed from homebrew, see Homebrew/homebrew-core@f052092). In my opinion, graalvm and babashka are better alternatives to lumo, and I don't see a reason - for new projects - to pick lumo over it. I'd like to know @hlolli opinion about it, does make sense to you to continue maintaining lumo? |
/status needs_merger |
Motivation for this change
newest version
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)/marvin opt-in
/status needs_reviewer