Skip to content

Conversation

@nixpkgs-committers
Copy link
Contributor

@nixpkgs-committers nixpkgs-committers bot commented Dec 9, 2025

This is an automated PR to retire @orivej-nixos as a Nixpkgs committer because they have not used their commit access in the past year.

@orivej-nixos: You can make a comment stating why you believe your commit access should be kept. Otherwise, this PR will be merged and implemented in one month.

Note

Commit access is not required for most forms of contributing, including being a maintainer and reviewing PRs. It is only needed for things that require write permissions to Nixpkgs, such as merging PRs.

cc @orivej

@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Contributor

wolfgangwalther commented Dec 9, 2025

This is one of the cases mentioned in #73 (comment), where the retirement script does not count squash and rebase merges from ~ the first half of the year. There was 1 of these in March. Orivej's maintainer entry in Nixpkgs has also recently been removed due to inactivity, thus we should just proceed here as written in the PR description.

@mweinelt

This comment was marked as resolved.

@mdaniels5757
Copy link
Member

mdaniels5757 commented Dec 9, 2025

For some more context, see NixOS/nixpkgs#442286 (comment) and NixOS/nixpkgs#442286 (comment). As far as I'm aware there was no response to that (or to NixOS/nixpkgs#463812).

@nixpkgs-committers nixpkgs-committers bot marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2026 17:22
@nixpkgs-committers
Copy link
Contributor Author

One month has passed, so this PR should now be merged and implemented by:

@nixpkgs-committers nixpkgs-committers bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2026 17:22
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther merged commit 3583d09 into main Jan 10, 2026
2 checks passed
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther deleted the retire-orivej-nixos branch January 10, 2026 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants