-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
Migrates concurrent root LP to OpenMP #1291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eb2cb94
fix some issues
akifcorduk ecef670
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:NVIDIA/cuopt into test_main_fix
akifcorduk fc92119
reenable incumbent callback tests
akifcorduk a74e830
move concurrent solve to omp and obey thread count
akifcorduk d5b7140
reduce comments
akifcorduk 8ad61dd
add cuda error recovery for capture
akifcorduk 0a5149b
test CI
akifcorduk 06352db
fix logger
akifcorduk 36e74d2
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:NVIDIA/cuopt into cuda_graph_side_c…
akifcorduk 4d2fb18
restore the api and use api suitable for <12.3
akifcorduk dba39c8
more comments
akifcorduk a307d7b
Merge branch 'cuda_graph_side_capture' into omp_migrate_concurrent_root
akifcorduk 1a2a3ca
revert cuDSS warmup + main-thread barrier handle construction
akifcorduk e7a462b
convert std::atomic to omp_atomic_
akifcorduk 56b6e84
fix ping pong graph major, non-major logic
akifcorduk 5882409
Merge branch 'cuda_graph_side_capture' into omp_migrate_concurrent_root
akifcorduk 71a2881
migrate concurrent LP mode to OpenMP
akifcorduk 299d3d3
recover original comment
nguidotti File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lower this MIP barrier gate to match the new task topology.
In MIP mode
run_concurrent()no longer launches dual simplex (cpp/src/pdlp/solve.cu, Lines 1615-1626), so this path only needs PDLP + barrier. Keeping the gate at3disables the barrier unnecessarily whenever exactly two threads are available.Suggested fix
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dual simplex is launched in B&B, not here. So the thread count is correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nguidotti, thanks for the clarification! That makes sense — since B&B dispatches the dual simplex as its own OpenMP task that still occupies a slot in the shared thread pool, the full budget of 3 (PDLP + barrier + dual simplex from B&B) is indeed required. My analysis was wrong to treat the B&B-launched dual simplex as outside the thread count. The gate and the comment are correct as written.🧠 Learnings used