Skip to content

Conversation

@WANDY666
Copy link
Contributor

@WANDY666 WANDY666 commented Jan 6, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @WANDY666, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a specific edge case in the metrics initialization logic. It ensures that the mtp_avg_token_per_step_buckets histogram is always provided with valid bucket definitions, even when the mtp_step argument is set to zero. This prevents errors or unexpected behavior in the metric system, contributing to more robust data collection.

Highlights

  • Metrics Initialization Fix: Introduced a conditional check to ensure the mtp_avg_token_per_step_buckets histogram is properly initialized with default values when the args.mtp_step parameter is zero, preventing potential issues with metric collection.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@WANDY666 WANDY666 merged commit 8134ca2 into main Jan 6, 2026
1 check passed
@WANDY666 WANDY666 deleted the WANDY666-patch-2 branch January 6, 2026 08:34
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a potential crash in metrics initialization. When args.mtp_step is 0, the code would previously generate an empty list for histogram buckets, leading to a ValueError. The added check correctly handles this edge case by providing a default bucket list. I have one suggestion to improve the code structure for better efficiency and clarity, although the current fix is functionally correct.

Comment on lines +99 to +100
if args.mtp_step == 0:
mtp_avg_token_per_step_buckets = [1.0, 2.0]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This correctly handles the case where args.mtp_step is 0. However, the current implementation first computes a list on line 98 (which will be empty if args.mtp_step is 0) and then immediately overwrites it. For better efficiency and readability, it would be preferable to use an if/else block to avoid the unnecessary computation.

You could refactor lines 98-100 like this:

        if args.mtp_step == 0:
            mtp_avg_token_per_step_buckets = [1.0, 2.0]
        else:
            mtp_avg_token_per_step_buckets = [i / 10.0 + 1.0 for i in range(0, 10 * args.mtp_step)]

This makes the logic more direct and avoids the redundant operation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants