-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
Update azure-disk-csi.md #206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
add limitation for classic VM disk resize
@fangzj1991 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
@fangzj1991 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
Learn Build status updates of commit 92c498e: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. For any questions, please:
|
@schaffererin - Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #label:"aq-pr-triaged" |
This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions. |
@schaffererin - Could you review this proposed update to your article and enter Thanks! |
This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions. |
Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged? @MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team |
add limitation for classic VM disk resize.
do lab with VM type Standard_D4_v3 and follow the resize doc it's not able to resize the PV with below error:
{
"error": {
"code": "OperationNotAllowed",
"message": "Change in disk property of VM of size 'Standard_D4_v3' is not supported."
}
root cause is the classic vm doesn't support online disk resize. User has reported this and we should have clear doc otherwise cx think it's only related with storageclass not VM type itself.