Skip to content

Broaden types converted to jsonb numeric #32563

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frankmcsherry
Copy link
Contributor

We detect a few scalar types that can convert into jsonb's numeric representation, but types we don't explicitly match are converted to strings.

Todo:

  1. add tests that cover these cases. The user reported error was for select jsonb_build_object('data', count(*)) from ...
  2. add exhaustive matches, to avoid missing cases like this in the future.

Putting up without this work to raise for discussion. Specifically, the code comments say

///   * All numeric types are converted to `Float64`s, then become JSON numbers.

which .. isn't actually what happens (they are directly converted to Numeric { max_scale: None }). If it is important that something very close to that happens we should discuss, but we already convert Numeric, which subsumes all of our integer types, into Numeric rather than Float64 or anything similar.

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@frankmcsherry frankmcsherry requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2025 14:17
@frankmcsherry frankmcsherry requested a review from aljoscha May 23, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant