Integrate schema generator #25
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes significant updates to various components and configuration files in the project. Key changes involve the upgrade of dependencies in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant DB
User->>App: Clicks Create New Button
App->>DB: loadSpec(newSpec())
DB-->>App: Returns new specification
App->>User: Displays new specification
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteAllButton.svelte (1)
14-14: Add error handling for database operations.While the change to use
newSpec()is good, the database operations should include error handling to gracefully handle failures.Consider wrapping the operations in a try-catch:
- db.apiSpecs.clear(); - loadSpec(newSpec()); + try { + await db.apiSpecs.clear(); + await loadSpec(newSpec()); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to clear specs:', error); + // TODO: Show error notification to user + }src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteButton.svelte (1)
Line range hint
12-23: Consider extracting click handler and improving UXThe component looks good, but here are some suggestions to improve maintainability and user experience:
Consider these improvements:
<script lang="ts"> import { newSpec } from '$lib/db'; import { db, loadSpec, type APISpec } from '$lib/db'; import type { CssClasses } from '@skeletonlabs/skeleton'; export let spec: APISpec; export let width: CssClasses = "w-full" + + async function handleDelete() { + const message = `Are you sure you want to delete '${spec.name}'?\nThis action cannot be undone.`; + if (!confirm(message)) return; + + await db.apiSpecs.delete(spec.id); + const specs = await db.apiSpecs.toArray(); + loadSpec(specs.length > 0 ? specs[0] : newSpec()); + } </script> <button class="btn variant-ghost-error {width}" - on:click={async () => { - if (confirm(`Are you sure you want to delete '${spec.name}'?`)) { - await db.apiSpecs.delete(spec.id); - const specs = await db.apiSpecs.toArray() - if (specs.length > 0){ - loadSpec(specs[0]); - } else { - loadSpec(newSpec()); - } - } - }} + on:click={handleDelete} >src/app.html (1)
7-18: Consider adding Content Security Policy headers.To enhance security when loading external scripts, consider adding CSP headers to restrict script sources.
Example CSP configuration to add to your deployment:
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' https://events.plygrnd.org;svelte.config.js (1)
Line range hint
14-17: Update comments to reflect current adapter usage.The comments still reference
adapter-auto, but the configuration now usesadapter-node. Consider updating the comments to avoid confusion.- // adapter-auto only supports some environments, see https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/adapter-auto for a list. - // If your environment is not supported or you settled on a specific environment, switch out the adapter. + // Using adapter-node for deployment + // See https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/adapter-node for more information about node adapter configuration. // See https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/adapters for more information about adapters. adapter: adapter()src/routes/+page.svelte (2)
Line range hint
35-38: Consider enhancing the name input field.The spec name input could benefit from:
- Input validation
- Debouncing to prevent excessive database updates
- Visual feedback when saving
Consider wrapping the input in a form component with validation:
-<input type="text" bind:value={$selectedSpec.name} class="input w-full" /> +<input + type="text" + bind:value={$selectedSpec.name} + class="input w-full" + pattern="[A-Za-z0-9\s\-_]+" + title="Alphanumeric characters, spaces, hyphens, and underscores only" + use:debounce={500} +/>You'll need to create a debounce action:
// actions/debounce.ts export function debounce(node: HTMLInputElement, delay: number) { let timer: NodeJS.Timeout; function handleInput() { clearTimeout(timer); timer = setTimeout(() => { node.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('debounced')); }, delay); } node.addEventListener('input', handleInput); return { destroy() { node.removeEventListener('input', handleInput); } }; }
Line range hint
77-80: Enhance the empty state UI.The current empty state only shows an upload button. Consider adding:
- A welcoming message
- Clear instructions for getting started
- Visual indicators or icons
Consider updating the empty state:
{:else} + <div class="flex flex-col items-center gap-4"> + <h2 class="h2">Welcome to the API Spec Manager</h2> + <p class="text-center">Get started by uploading your first API specification</p> <UploadButton /> + </div> {/if}src/lib/db.ts (2)
44-47: LGTM! Consider fixing indentation.The change to make
newSpeca function that returns a fresh copy usingstructuredCloneis a good improvement. It prevents accidental mutations of a shared reference.Fix the indentation to use tabs for consistency:
export const newSpec: () => APISpec = () => structuredClone({ - name: 'OpenAPI', - spec: blankSpec + name: 'OpenAPI', + spec: blankSpec })
61-62: Document the purpose of new loading state stores.The newly added
specLoadedandpageLoadedstores lack documentation explaining their purpose, usage, and relationship. This documentation would be valuable for maintainability.Consider adding JSDoc comments:
+/** Indicates whether the API specification has been loaded successfully */ export const specLoaded: Writable<boolean> = writable(false); +/** Indicates whether the page and all its dependencies have been loaded */ export const pageLoaded: Writable<boolean> = writable(false);src/lib/components/FileManagement/DownloadButtons.svelte (2)
6-7: Add type import and JSDoc documentation for the new props.The new props enhance component flexibility, but there are a few improvements needed:
- The
CssClassestype is used but not imported- Props would benefit from JSDoc documentation explaining their purpose and expected values
Add the following at the top of the script:
<script lang="ts"> + import type { CssClasses } from '$lib/types'; import { selectedSpec } from '$lib/db'; // ... other imports + /** CSS classes to control the width of the buttons. @default "w-full" */ export let width: CssClasses = "w-full" + /** CSS classes to control the padding of the buttons. @default "px-2 py-0.5" */ export let padding: CssClasses = "px-2 py-0.5"
Line range hint
42-85: Consider extracting common button styles to reduce duplication.Both buttons share identical class structures and similar markup. Consider extracting the common elements to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Create a reusable button component or use a common class variable:
<script lang="ts"> // ... existing imports and props const commonButtonClass = `btn btn-sm ${width} ${padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1`; </script> <button type="button" on:click={saveYAML} class={commonButtonClass} aria-label="Download a YAML representation of the OpenAPI document." > YAML <svg>...</svg> </button> <button type="button" on:click={saveJSON} class={commonButtonClass} aria-label="Download a JSON representation of the OpenAPI document." > JSON <svg>...</svg> </button>src/lib/components/sections/Info.svelte (1)
51-54: Remove unnecessary empty lines.The flexbox layout implementation looks good, but there are two empty lines that can be removed to improve code readability.
Apply this diff:
<div class="flex flex-row flex-wrap w-full gap-2"> - - <div class="border-token grow rounded-container-token bg-surface-backdrop-token space-y-1 p-4">src/lib/components/sections/Authentication.svelte (3)
Line range hint
14-41: Add validation for duplicate schema names.The
addSecuritySchemafunction should validate that the new schema name doesn't conflict with existing schemas to prevent overwriting.Consider adding validation before adding the new schema:
if (newSchema) { + const schemaNames = tempSchemaList.map(schema => schema.name); + if (schemaNames.includes(newSchema.name)) { + // Handle duplicate schema name + return; + } tempSchemaList = [...tempSchemaList, newSchema]; $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = tempSchemaList; }
Line range hint
85-93: Handle potential undefined securitySchemes in else block.The button click handler in the else block calls
addSecuritySchemawithout a selected schema type, which could lead to undefined behavior.Consider initializing the schema type:
<button class="btn variant-ghost-success" on:click={() => { + selectedSchema = 'basicAuth'; // Set a default addSecuritySchema(); }} >
71-82: Consider adding loading state handling.The form interactions might have latency when updating the spec. Consider adding loading states to prevent multiple submissions.
Add loading state handling:
<script lang="ts"> + let isLoading = false; // ... existing code ... </script> <span class="flex flex-wrap justify-center items-center gap-2 max-w-sm mx-auto"> <select name="security-schema" bind:value={selectedSchema} class="input w-fit text-sm grow" + disabled={isLoading} > <!-- ... options ... --> </select> <button type="button" class="btn text-sm variant-filled-primary grow" + disabled={isLoading} on:click={async () => { + isLoading = true; await addSecuritySchema(); + isLoading = false; }} > Add Security Schema </button> </span>src/lib/components/FileManagement/UploadModal.svelte (1)
Line range hint
134-143: Consider improving the save operation implementationThe current implementation has several potential issues:
- Using both
loadSpecandsaveSpecseems redundant- Missing error handling for the save operation
- The saving state isn't reset if an error occurs
Consider refactoring the save operation like this:
<button class="btn variant-ghost-success w-full" on:click={async () => { saving = true; - loadSpec($uploadSpec); - await saveSpec($uploadSpec); - parent.onClose(); + try { + await saveSpec($uploadSpec); + parent.onClose(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to save spec:', error); + // Handle error appropriately + } finally { + saving = false; + } }} >src/lib/components/sections/Paths.svelte (2)
21-21: LGTM! Consider adding a safe-area-inset for mobile devices.The responsive design changes improve the button container's positioning across different screen sizes. The fixed positioning with different bottom spacing for mobile/desktop is well thought out.
Consider adding
env(safe-area-inset-bottom)to ensure the buttons remain accessible on mobile devices with home indicators:-class="fixed bottom-1 md:bottom-5 md:w-full md:max-w-[270px] w-fit shadow-xl flex flex-row gap-2 justify-between bg-surface-100-800-token rounded-full md:p-3 p-1" +class="fixed bottom-[calc(0.25rem+env(safe-area-inset-bottom))] md:bottom-5 md:w-full md:max-w-[270px] w-fit shadow-xl flex flex-row gap-2 justify-between bg-surface-100-800-token rounded-full md:p-3 p-1"
74-74: LGTM! Consider adjusting the bottom margin based on button container height.The responsive padding adjustments improve content presentation across different screen sizes. The bottom margin ensures content isn't hidden behind the fixed button container.
Consider making the bottom margin responsive to match the button container's height:
-class="mx-auto border-token rounded-container-token bg-surface-backdrop-token md:px-6 px-2 md:py-4 py-2 space-y-4 mb-10" +class="mx-auto border-token rounded-container-token bg-surface-backdrop-token md:px-6 px-2 md:py-4 py-2 space-y-4 mb-16 md:mb-20"src/lib/components/atoms/AuthenticationItem.svelte (2)
Line range hint
14-19: Remove @ts-expect-error by improving type safetyMultiple TypeScript errors are being suppressed with
@ts-expect-error. These can be eliminated with proper type narrowing.Consider adding type guards and proper type narrowing:
function isSecuritySchemeObject( schema: OpenAPIV3_1.SecuritySchemeObject | OpenAPIV3_1.ReferenceObject ): schema is OpenAPIV3_1.SecuritySchemeObject { return !('$ref' in schema); } // Then use it in your component: $: if (isSecuritySchemeObject(schemaObject) && schemaObject.type === 'oauth2') { availableFlows = availableFlows.filter((flow) => { if (!schemaObject.flows) return true; return !Object.keys(schemaObject.flows).includes(flow); }); }Also applies to: 26-27, 33-34
Line range hint
26-39: Improve OAuth flow managementThe current implementation has some inefficiencies and potential issues:
- Direct mutation of the schema object
- Unnecessary temporary object creation in
removeOauthFlowConsider these improvements:
const removeOauthFlow = (flow: 'implicit' | 'password' | 'clientCredentials' | 'authorizationCode') => { - // @ts-expect-error - security schema definition is lacking a bit - let tempFlows = schema.flows; - delete tempFlows[flow]; - // @ts-expect-error - security schema definition is lacking a bit - schema.flows = tempFlows; + if (isSecuritySchemeObject(schemaObject) && schemaObject.type === 'oauth2') { + const { [flow]: _, ...remainingFlows } = schemaObject.flows || {}; + schemaObject.flows = remainingFlows; + } // add flow back to availableFlows availableFlows = [...availableFlows, flow]; };src/routes/paths/[...pathName]/z/[method]/+page.svelte (1)
9-9: Add type annotation for better type safety.The
newParamvariable should have a type annotation to ensure type safety.-let newParam = 'query'; +let newParam: 'query' | 'header' | 'cookie' = 'query';src/routes/FancyAppRail.svelte (2)
16-29: Add accessibility attributes to SVG iconWhile the SVG implementation is good, it should include accessibility attributes for screen readers.
Add either:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" fill="none" viewBox="0 0 24 24" stroke-width="1.5" stroke="currentColor" + aria-hidden="true" class="size-6 mx-auto" >Or:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" fill="none" viewBox="0 0 24 24" stroke-width="1.5" stroke="currentColor" + role="img" + aria-label="File icon" class="size-6 mx-auto" >
Line range hint
3-3: Remove unused importThe
DownloadButtonscomponent is imported but not used in the template.-import DownloadButtons from '$lib/components/FileManagement/DownloadButtons.svelte';src/lib/components/atoms/ParameterInput.svelte (1)
8-10: Add a comment explaining the OpenAPI specification requirement.While the logic is correct, adding a comment would help explain why path parameters must be required according to the OpenAPI specification.
+// Path parameters must always be required as per OpenAPI specification if (value.in === 'path') { value.required = true; }src/routes/+layout.svelte (2)
51-51: Remove unnecessary console.log statementThe
console.logon line 51 is for debugging and can be removed to clean up console output.Apply this diff to remove the
console.log:- console.log('apiSpecs load', $selectedSpecId, $selectedSpec);
64-64: Remove debugging console.log statementThe
console.log('ctrl+s');is unnecessary in production code and can be removed.Apply this diff to remove the
console.log:- console.log('ctrl+s');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlsrc/routes/paths/[index]/error.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpg
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/app.html (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/CreateNewButton.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteAllButton.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteButton.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/DownloadButtons.svelte (4 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/SaveButton.svelte (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/UploadButton.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/UploadModal.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/atoms/AuthenticationItem.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/lib/components/atoms/LicenseAtom.svelte (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/atoms/ParameterInput.svelte (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/atoms/PathListItem.svelte (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/sections/Authentication.svelte (3 hunks)
- src/lib/components/sections/Info.svelte (2 hunks)
- src/lib/components/sections/Paths.svelte (3 hunks)
- src/lib/db.ts (1 hunks)
- src/routes/+layout.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/routes/+page.svelte (3 hunks)
- src/routes/FancyAppRail.svelte (2 hunks)
- src/routes/components/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/routes/paths/[...pathName]/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/routes/paths/[...pathName]/z/[method]/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+error.svelte (0 hunks)
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+page.svelte (0 hunks)
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+page.ts (0 hunks)
- src/routes/webhooks/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
- svelte.config.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+error.svelte
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+page.svelte
- src/routes/paths/[index]/+page.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/lib/components/FileManagement/UploadButton.svelte
- src/routes/components/+page.svelte
- src/routes/webhooks/+page.svelte
🔇 Additional comments (34)
src/lib/components/FileManagement/CreateNewButton.svelte (2)
17-17: LGTM! Improved button label conciseness.The shorter label "New" is more concise while maintaining clarity, following common UI patterns.
13-13: Verify that newSpec is now a function.The change from
structuredClone(newSpec)tonewSpec()suggests thatnewSpechas been changed from an object to a function in the db module.Let's verify this change:
✅ Verification successful
The change from
structuredClone(newSpec)tonewSpec()is correctThe verification confirms that
newSpecis indeed exported as a function insrc/lib/db.ts:export const newSpec: () => APISpec = () => structuredClone({ name: 'OpenAPI', spec: blankSpec })The change in
CreateNewButton.svelteis actually removing redundant cloning sincenewSpec()already returns a cloned object usingstructuredCloneinternally.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that newSpec is exported as a function in the db module # Expected: Find the declaration/export of newSpec as a function # Search for newSpec declaration in db module ast-grep --pattern 'export const newSpec = () => { $$$ }' # Alternatively, look for any newSpec declaration rg -A 5 'export.*newSpec'Length of output: 609
src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteAllButton.svelte (1)
14-14: Verify the newSpec function implementation.Let's ensure that the
newSpecfunction is properly implemented as a function returning anAPISpec.✅ Verification successful
newSpecfunction implementation is correctly defined and typedThe
newSpecfunction is properly implemented as an exported function that returns anAPISpec. It creates a new spec by cloning a template containing:
- A properly typed return value (
: () => APISpec)- Required
nameproperty initialized as 'OpenAPI'specproperty initialized with a blank OpenAPI 3.1 document template🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the newSpec implementation in db.ts # Expected: newSpec should be exported as a function that returns an APISpec # Search for the newSpec implementation rg -t typescript "export .*newSpec.*="Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to find newSpec implementation # Search for newSpec function definition using ast-grep ast-grep --pattern 'function newSpec() { $$$ }' # Also search for any occurrence of newSpec using ripgrep rg "newSpec" # Search for files with "spec" in their name fd -t f "spec"Length of output: 1281
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the implementation in db.ts more closely cat src/lib/db.tsLength of output: 2586
src/lib/components/FileManagement/SaveButton.svelte (2)
6-6: LGTM! Well-structured property declaration.The new padding property follows component design best practices with proper typing and a sensible default value.
16-16: LGTM! Clean class binding implementation.The button styling implementation correctly incorporates the new padding property while maintaining existing functionality.
src/lib/components/FileManagement/DeleteButton.svelte (1)
20-20: Verify error handling for newSpec()The change from
structuredClone(newSpec)tonewSpec()looks good, but we should ensure proper error handling.Let's verify the implementation of newSpec and loadSpec functions:
Consider adding error handling:
- loadSpec(newSpec()); + try { + loadSpec(newSpec()); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create new spec:', error); + // Handle error appropriately (e.g., show error toast) + }src/app.html (2)
12-18: LGTM! Analytics initialization follows best practices.The Plausible analytics initialization:
- Uses proper queue-based implementation
- Handles undefined cases correctly
- Is placed appropriately in the document head
7-11: Verify the analytics endpoint security and configuration.The external analytics script is loaded from
events.plygrnd.org. Please ensure:
- This is the correct and secure analytics endpoint
- The
data-domainvalue "openapi.gg" matches your deployment domainsvelte.config.js (1)
1-1: LGTM: Adapter change is properly implemented.The switch to
@sveltejs/adapter-nodeis correctly configured in the import statement.src/lib/components/atoms/PathListItem.svelte (3)
12-14: Well-structured responsive layout improvements!The changes enhance mobile responsiveness through:
- Flexible wrapping with
flex-wrap- Mobile-specific context with
<span class="md:hidden">Path: </span>- Proper gap handling for different screen sizes
Line range hint
37-44: Good error handling practices!The Remove button implementation follows best practices:
- Visually distinct error styling
- Interactive hover state
- Modal confirmation through modalStore
Line range hint
2-9: Consider removing unusedidpropThe
idprop is exported but appears to be unused in the template since the href now usespathName. Ifidis no longer needed, consider removing it to maintain clean code.Let's verify if
idis used elsewhere:package.json (4)
24-25: TypeScript ESLint dependencies are in sync.The update of both
@typescript-eslint/eslint-pluginand@typescript-eslint/parserto version^7.16.0maintains proper version alignment between these complementary packages.
56-56: Package manager lock is properly specified.The addition of the
packageManagerfield with a specific pnpm version and integrity hash ensures consistent package management across the team.
27-27: Minor version update for Dexie database.The update of
dexiefrom^4.0.7to^4.0.8is a patch version change, which should only contain backwards-compatible bug fixes.Let's check for any Dexie-specific breaking changes or deprecation warnings:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Dexie usage patterns that might need updates rg "new Dexie\(" --type ts --type js
17-17: Verify the adapter change impact on deployment.The switch from
@sveltejs/adapter-autoto@sveltejs/adapter-node@^5.2.0indicates a shift to a Node.js-specific deployment strategy. This change requires proper configuration in your deployment environment.Ensure your deployment pipeline is updated to handle Node.js-specific requirements. Consider:
- Setting appropriate Node.js environment variables
- Configuring proper port bindings
- Setting up process management (PM2, etc.)
✅ Verification successful
I'll examine the actual adapter configuration to verify if it's properly set up for Node.js deployment and determine if there are any potential issues or missing configurations.
The adapter change is properly configured and safe to proceed
The switch to
@sveltejs/adapter-nodeis correctly implemented insvelte.config.jswith the proper import and configuration. The adapter is initialized with default settings, which is suitable for most Node.js deployments. The configuration follows the official SvelteKit patterns and best practices.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the adapter configuration in svelte.config.js rg -l "adapter-node" --type jsLength of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the adapter configuration in svelte.config.js cat svelte.config.jsLength of output: 761
src/routes/+page.svelte (3)
2-14: Well-structured imports and improved state management!Moving
pageLoadedandspecLoadedto global stores in$lib/dbimproves state management across components. The use ofliveQueryforapiSpecsensures reactive database updates.
Line range hint
27-46: Well-structured loading state and card layout!The conditional rendering and card layout provide a clean user interface with appropriate loading indicators.
Line range hint
16-25: Add error handling for undefined spec.While the reactive stats declaration is well-structured, consider adding null checks to handle cases where
$selectedSpec.specmight be undefined.Consider updating the stats calculation:
$: stats = [ { title: 'Paths', - value: pathCount($selectedSpec.spec) + value: $selectedSpec?.spec ? pathCount($selectedSpec.spec) : 0 }, { title: 'Operation IDs', - value: operationCount($selectedSpec.spec) + value: $selectedSpec?.spec ? operationCount($selectedSpec.spec) : 0 } ];src/lib/components/FileManagement/DownloadButtons.svelte (1)
Line range hint
1-85: Implementation looks good overall!The component demonstrates good practices:
- Proper error handling
- Correct MIME types for downloads
- Clean URL management
- Good accessibility with aria-labels
- Enhanced reusability with the new styling props
The changes improve the component's flexibility without compromising its core functionality.
src/lib/components/sections/Info.svelte (2)
Line range hint
7-104: LGTM! Form implementation follows best practices.The form structure demonstrates good practices:
- Proper use of two-way binding
- Clear input validation
- Well-structured conditional rendering for contact information
- Appropriate input types and placeholders
Line range hint
1-4: Verify integration with updated db.ts.Since
db.tshas undergone changes to thenewSpecfunction, let's verify that the initialization ofselectedSpecstore still works correctly with this component.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the
newSpecfunction and its implementation.
Let me check one final thing to see the complete implementation of
newSpecand the store initialization.
Integration with db.ts is correctly implemented
The verification shows that the integration is working as expected:
newSpec()function creates a new API spec usingblankSpectemplateselectedSpecstore is properly initialized withnewSpec()- The Info.svelte component correctly uses the store with proper bindings to all relevant fields
- The store's subscription ensures it's never null by creating a new spec if needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of newSpec and its usage # Expected: Find the newSpec implementation and its usage in store initialization # Check the implementation of newSpec in db.ts rg -A 5 "newSpec.*=.*function" src/lib/db.ts # Check store initialization rg -A 5 "selectedSpec.*=.*writable" src/lib/db.tsLength of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the complete implementation of newSpec function rg -A 10 "export.*function.*newSpec" src/lib/db.ts # Check how selectedSpec is used in Info.svelte rg "selectedSpec" src/lib/components/sections/Info.svelteLength of output: 602
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete content of db.ts to understand newSpec implementation cat src/lib/db.tsLength of output: 2586
src/lib/components/sections/Authentication.svelte (1)
53-53:⚠️ Potential issueReview the use of Object.entries with an array.
The code uses
Object.entrieson what appears to be an array (securitySchemes). This might lead to unexpected behavior as array indices will be included in the iteration.Let's verify the structure of securitySchemes:
If
securitySchemesis an array, consider using:-{#each Object.entries($selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes) as schema, index} +{#each $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes as schema, index}src/lib/components/atoms/LicenseAtom.svelte (2)
6-12: LGTM! Well-structured data transformation.The transformation of
spdxLicenseListinto a structured array improves type safety and makes the data easier to work with throughout the component.
117-118: LGTM! Good default license choice.Using MIT as the default license is a common and sensible choice for new projects.
src/lib/components/FileManagement/UploadModal.svelte (1)
16-16: LGTM: Correct initialization of uploadSpec storeThe change to call
newSpec()as a function aligns with the updated implementation insrc/lib/db.ts.src/lib/components/sections/Paths.svelte (2)
26-26: LGTM! Button styling aligns with the compact design.The addition of
btn-smandgrowclasses appropriately sizes the button and ensures proper space distribution within the flex container.
51-51: LGTM! Consistent button styling maintained.The styling matches the Add Path button, maintaining visual consistency across the interface.
src/routes/FancyAppRail.svelte (2)
8-8: LGTM: Improved responsive designThe width property now properly handles different screen sizes, providing a better mobile experience while maintaining the desktop layout.
157-157: LGTM: Improved text wrappingThe addition of whitespace control and padding classes improves the text layout within the narrow rail space.
src/lib/components/atoms/ParameterInput.svelte (2)
70-76: LGTM! Clear and correct parameter name display logic.The conditional rendering properly handles the display of path parameters with curly braces and regular parameters without them.
83-84: LGTM! Appropriate handling of path parameter constraints.The location select is correctly disabled for path parameters while maintaining two-way binding.
src/routes/+layout.svelte (2)
4-4: Imports are appropriately updatedThe new imports from
@skeletonlabs/skeletonare correctly added to accommodate the new components used later in the file.
74-94: UI components are properly integratedThe
AppShell,AppBar, and related components are correctly implemented, enhancing the layout and user interface.
| <a href="/paths/{pathName}" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-primary grow md:w-fit w-full">Edit</a> | ||
| <div class="grow flex flex-row gap-1"> | ||
| <button | ||
| type="button" | ||
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-warning grow" | ||
| on:click={() => { | ||
| renamePath(modalStore, pathName); | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| Change path | ||
| </button> | ||
| <button | ||
| type="button" | ||
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-secondary grow" | ||
| on:click={() => { | ||
| addPath(modalStore, pathName); | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| Add Sub-Route | ||
| </button> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider standardizing button widths
While the current layout is functional, the grow class on buttons might lead to inconsistent button widths depending on their content. Consider using fixed widths or min-width constraints for more consistent UI.
-<a href="/paths/{pathName}" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-primary grow md:w-fit w-full">Edit</a>
+<a href="/paths/{pathName}" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-primary min-w-[100px] md:w-fit w-full">Edit</a>
-<button type="button" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-warning grow"
+<button type="button" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-warning min-w-[100px]"
-<button type="button" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-secondary grow"
+<button type="button" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-secondary min-w-[100px]"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <a href="/paths/{pathName}" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-primary grow md:w-fit w-full">Edit</a> | |
| <div class="grow flex flex-row gap-1"> | |
| <button | |
| type="button" | |
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-warning grow" | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| renamePath(modalStore, pathName); | |
| }} | |
| > | |
| Change path | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| type="button" | |
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-secondary grow" | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| addPath(modalStore, pathName); | |
| }} | |
| > | |
| Add Sub-Route | |
| </button> | |
| </div> | |
| <a href="/paths/{pathName}" class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-primary min-w-[100px] md:w-fit w-full">Edit</a> | |
| <div class="grow flex flex-row gap-1"> | |
| <button | |
| type="button" | |
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-warning min-w-[100px]" | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| renamePath(modalStore, pathName); | |
| }} | |
| > | |
| Change path | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| type="button" | |
| class="btn btn-sm variant-filled-secondary min-w-[100px]" | |
| on:click={() => { | |
| addPath(modalStore, pathName); | |
| }} | |
| > | |
| Add Sub-Route | |
| </button> | |
| </div> |
| "pnpm": "8" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Node.js version requirement needs documentation and CI setup
The project requires Node.js >20.0.0, but this requirement is not documented in README.md and there are no CI configuration files detected. Several dependencies in pnpm-lock.yaml already support Node.js 20, indicating compatibility.
- Add Node.js and pnpm version requirements to README.md
- Set up CI/CD configuration with the specified Node.js version
- Consider adding a version check script in package.json
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Node.js version compatibility.
The engine requirements specify Node.js >20.0.0 and pnpm 8, which are relatively recent versions. This might impact development and deployment environments.
Ensure all development and CI/CD environments meet these requirements. Consider:
- Updating CI/CD pipeline configurations
- Documenting the requirements in README
- Adding version checks in development scripts
Let me check the CI/CD configuration files to get a complete picture.
Let me check for CI configuration files specifically to complete the verification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if README mentions Node.js version requirement
rg -i "node(\s+)?([>=])?20" README.md || echo "Node.js version requirement not documented in README.md"
Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check CI/CD configuration files for Node.js version
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg -i "node(\s+)?([>=])?20|node-version"
# Check for any development scripts that might contain version checks
fd -e sh -e js package.json | xargs rg -i "node(\s+)?version|engine"
Length of output: 12679
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for CI configuration files in common locations
fd -e yml -e yaml -p '.github/workflows|.gitlab-ci|.circleci'
Length of output: 63
| export const selectedSpec: Writable<APISpec> = writable(newSpec()) | ||
|
|
||
| selectedSpec.subscribe((spec) => { | ||
| if(!spec){ | ||
| spec = structuredClone(newSpec) | ||
| spec = newSpec() | ||
| } | ||
| if(spec.id){ | ||
| selectedSpecId.set(spec.id) | ||
| } | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix subscription logic to properly handle undefined specs.
The current subscription logic has an issue where it attempts to reassign the parameter spec. This won't propagate back to the store as expected.
Consider this alternative implementation:
export const selectedSpec: Writable<APISpec> = writable(newSpec())
selectedSpec.subscribe((spec) => {
- if(!spec){
- spec = newSpec()
- }
+ if (!spec) {
+ selectedSpec.set(newSpec())
+ return
+ }
if(spec.id){
selectedSpecId.set(spec.id)
}
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const selectedSpec: Writable<APISpec> = writable(newSpec()) | |
| selectedSpec.subscribe((spec) => { | |
| if(!spec){ | |
| spec = structuredClone(newSpec) | |
| spec = newSpec() | |
| } | |
| if(spec.id){ | |
| selectedSpecId.set(spec.id) | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| export const selectedSpec: Writable<APISpec> = writable(newSpec()) | |
| selectedSpec.subscribe((spec) => { | |
| if (!spec) { | |
| selectedSpec.set(newSpec()) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| if(spec.id){ | |
| selectedSpecId.set(spec.id) | |
| } | |
| }) |
| @@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ | |||
| <button | |||
| type="button" | |||
| on:click={saveJSON} | |||
| class="btn btn-sm rounded-lg w-full variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1" | |||
| class="btn btn-sm {width} {padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove extra space in class attribute.
There's an extra space in the class attribute which could cause inconsistent styling between the buttons.
- class="btn btn-sm {width} {padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1"
+ class="btn btn-sm {width} {padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class="btn btn-sm {width} {padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1" | |
| class="btn btn-sm {width} {padding} variant-ghost-tertiary gap-1" |
| let tempSchemaList = $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes; | ||
| tempSchemaList.splice(index, 1); | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.security = tempSchemaList; | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = tempSchemaList; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check and avoid direct array mutation.
The removeSecuritySchema function:
- Lacks null checking unlike
addSecuritySchema - Mutates state directly with splice
Consider this safer implementation:
const removeSecuritySchema = (index: number) => {
- let tempSchemaList = $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes;
- tempSchemaList.splice(index, 1);
- $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = tempSchemaList;
+ const securitySchemes = $selectedSpec.spec.components?.securitySchemes;
+ if (!securitySchemes) return;
+ $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = [
+ ...securitySchemes.slice(0, index),
+ ...securitySchemes.slice(index + 1)
+ ];
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let tempSchemaList = $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes; | |
| tempSchemaList.splice(index, 1); | |
| $selectedSpec.spec.security = tempSchemaList; | |
| $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = tempSchemaList; | |
| }; | |
| const securitySchemes = $selectedSpec.spec.components?.securitySchemes; | |
| if (!securitySchemes) return; | |
| $selectedSpec.spec.components.securitySchemes = [ | |
| ...securitySchemes.slice(0, index), | |
| ...securitySchemes.slice(index + 1) | |
| ]; |
|
|
||
| pathVariables.forEach((variable) => { | ||
| // push path variables to the parameters array | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - working with a array thats loosely defined |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address TypeScript errors instead of suppressing them
There are multiple instances where @ts-expect-error is used to suppress TypeScript errors (lines 27, 87-88, 107-108, 178-179). Suppressing errors can mask underlying issues and make the code harder to maintain. Consider resolving the type errors by properly defining types or using type assertions to ensure type safety.
Also applies to: 87-88, 107-108, 178-179
| let tempPath: OpenAPIV3_1.PathItemObject = { | ||
| parameters: [] | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Initialize 'servers' array in 'tempPath'
In lines 123-135, tempPath.servers is accessed, but the servers array is not initialized when tempPath is defined (lines 19-21). This could lead to undefined errors when trying to access or modify tempPath.servers. Initialize the servers array when defining tempPath.
Apply this diff to initialize the servers array:
let tempPath: OpenAPIV3_1.PathItemObject = {
parameters: [],
+ servers: []
};Also applies to: 123-135
| import { selectedSpec } from '$lib/db'; | ||
| import { page } from '$app/stores'; | ||
|
|
||
| $: console.log($page.params.pathName); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugging statement before deployment
The console.log statement on line 10 is useful for debugging but should be removed or replaced with a proper logging mechanism before deploying to production to avoid unnecessary console output.
Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
-$: console.log($page.params.pathName);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| $: console.log($page.params.pathName); |
| // @ts-expect-error - this is a valid access | ||
| switch (event.target.checked) { | ||
| case true: | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = newMethod(); | ||
| break; | ||
|
|
||
| case false: | ||
| if (confirm('Are you sure you want to remove this operation?')) { | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = undefined; | ||
| } else { | ||
| event.target.checked = true; | ||
| } | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor 'switch' statement to 'if-else' and avoid mutating 'event.target.checked'
In the on:change handler (lines 178-194), a switch statement is used on the boolean event.target.checked, which can be simplified using an if-else statement for better readability. Additionally, directly modifying event.target.checked is not recommended. Instead, manage the checkbox state through reactive variables.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
-on:change={(event) => {
- // @ts-expect-error - this is a valid access
- switch (event.target.checked) {
- case true:
- // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck
- $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = newMethod();
- break;
- case false:
- if (confirm('Are you sure you want to remove this operation?')) {
- // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck
- $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = undefined;
- } else {
- event.target.checked = true;
- }
- break;
- }
-}}
+on:change={(event) => {
+ const isChecked = event.target.checked;
+ // @ts-expect-error - valid access
+ if (isChecked) {
+ $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = newMethod();
+ } else {
+ if (confirm('Are you sure you want to remove this operation?')) {
+ $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = undefined;
+ } else {
+ // Revert the checkbox state without directly modifying event.target.checked
+ event.target.checked = true; // Consider using a reactive variable to control this state
+ }
+ }
+}}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| on:click={() => { | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName].description = ''; | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| Add Description | ||
| </button> | ||
| {/if} | ||
| </label> | ||
| </svelte:fragment> | ||
| </AccordionItem> | ||
| <AccordionItem open> | ||
| <svelte:fragment slot="summary"> | ||
| <h4 class="h4">Custom Servers</h4> | ||
| </svelte:fragment> | ||
| <svelte:fragment slot="content"> | ||
| <p>Here you can add custom servers for this specific call.</p> | ||
| {#if tempPath.servers && tempPath.servers.length > 0} | ||
| {#each tempPath.servers as server, index} | ||
| <label class="space-y-2"> | ||
| <p>Server {index + 1}</p> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="text" | ||
| class="input" | ||
| bind:value={server.url} | ||
| placeholder="URL of the server" | ||
| /> | ||
| </label> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| {/if} | ||
|
|
||
| <button type="button" class="btn variant-filled-primary"> Add Server </button> | ||
| </svelte:fragment> | ||
| </AccordionItem> | ||
| <AccordionItem> | ||
| <svelte:fragment slot="summary"> | ||
| <h4 class="h4">Parameters</h4> | ||
| </svelte:fragment> | ||
| <svelte:fragment slot="content"> | ||
| {#if tempPath.parameters} | ||
| {#each tempPath.parameters.filter(filterParams) as param} | ||
| <ParameterInput variableName={param.name} bind:value={param} location="path" /> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| {/if} | ||
|
|
||
| <span class="flex items-center gap-2"> | ||
| <select name="newParameter" bind:value={newParam} class="select w-min"> | ||
| <option value="query">Query</option> | ||
| <option value="header">Header</option> | ||
| <option value="cookie">Cookie</option> | ||
| </select> | ||
| <button type="button" class="btn variant-filled-primary"> | ||
| Add {newParam} Parameter | ||
| </button> | ||
| </span> | ||
| </svelte:fragment> | ||
| </AccordionItem> | ||
| </Accordion> | ||
| <h4 class="h4">Operations</h4> | ||
|
|
||
| <p>Here you can add operations for this path. Select only the operations you want to support</p> | ||
|
|
||
| {#if $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName]} | ||
| <div class="flex flex-col gap-2"> | ||
| {#each Object.values(HttpMethods) as method} | ||
| <div class="flex flex-row gap-2 justify-between max-w-xs"> | ||
| <label class="flex items-center gap-2"> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="checkbox" | ||
| class="checkbox" | ||
| checked={$selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName]?.hasOwnProperty(method)} | ||
| on:change={(event) => { | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - this is a valid access | ||
| switch (event.target.checked) { | ||
| case true: | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = newMethod(); | ||
| break; | ||
|
|
||
| case false: | ||
| if (confirm('Are you sure you want to remove this operation?')) { | ||
| // @ts-expect-error - already inside a nullcheck | ||
| $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName][method] = undefined; | ||
| } else { | ||
| event.target.checked = true; | ||
| } | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| {method.toUpperCase()} | ||
| </label> | ||
| <a href={`/paths/${$page.params.pathName}/z/${method}`} class="btn btn-sm variant-ghost-success"> | ||
| Edit | ||
| </a> | ||
| </div> | ||
| {/each} | ||
| </div> | ||
| {/if} | ||
| {/if} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Store frequently accessed properties in a variable for readability
Throughout the component (lines 67-205), $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName] is accessed repeatedly. Storing this in a local variable improves readability and may enhance performance due to fewer repeated property lookups.
Apply this diff to store the property in a variable:
<script lang="ts">
+ let currentPath = $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName];
</script>
- {#if $selectedSpec.spec.paths != undefined && $page.params.pathName != undefined && $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName] != undefined}
+ {#if currentPath}
...
- {#if $selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName]?.summary != undefined}
+ {#if currentPath.summary != undefined}
...
- bind:value={$selectedSpec.spec.paths[$page.params.pathName].summary}
+ bind:value={currentPath.summary}
...Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores