Add a controlled customer-run homelab - #69
Draft
ebeirne wants to merge 8 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Remote validation is green at head 2dacb69: both the homelab contract and containerized end-to-end proof passed. Run: https://github.com/Lians-ai/Lians/actions/runs/30692036223 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
homelab-sample/v1contract with a checked-in synthetic fixturehomelab-dataset/v1NDJSON contract*.local.ndjsonpartner fixtures while keeping mounted inputs read-only.envfiles without printing or replacing existing valuesWhy
Prospective customers need a reproducible way to validate a declared Lians integration and representative data shape before a pilot, without uploading production data or treating browser-only preflight as execution proof. The default stays laptop-sized; larger local intake is measured rather than claimed.
Scope
The homelab remains disposable and loopback-only. A passing receipt proves only the exact declared scenario, file, host, build, and safety envelope. It is not a general compatibility, production-capacity, security, compliance, or vendor-endorsement claim.
Per-record writes are deliberate because they preserve deterministic idempotency. Higher-throughput batch transport needs an explicit dataset-level idempotency contract first. API replicas likewise require a shared metrics strategy.
This PR is intentionally stacked on
security/hardening-20260730, because the homelab depends on that runtime hardening. It does not modify the security PR branch.Validation
bf0419e: 3/3 records succeeded, 0 failed, sanitized receipt emittedbf0419ewith Ed25519signature_valid: true, replayable evidence grade, and exact trace/source binding