chore: adding unit test to test getNodeFromPath failures

[nadr0]

relates #4850

Issue

When Jess sketched the final lineTo with close which which was invoked in sceneEntities.ts the code appeared to fail when finding a node in the function getNodeFromPath which produces a toast error.

Implementation

There are tons of calls to getNodeFromPath which is the location that the error not an object comes from. Retracing her steps I could not manually reproduce this error by using the application.

I followed the block of code in sceneEntities.ts:787 which goes into the block of snapping logic to snap back to the original point and create a lineTo and close block.

I implemented a set of unit tests to see if I can create this failure

   ✓ Testing specific sketch getNodeFromPath workflow (3)
     ✓ should parse the code
     ✓ should find the location to add new lineTo
     ✓ it should find the location to add close

I mimic the same code flow to call the code mods that need to call getNodeFromPath and in this example with the same exact code I was unable to reproduce that same error.

[qa-wolf]

QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up.
Click here to request test coverage for this PR!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
modeling-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 25, 2025 0:37am

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.14%. Comparing base (440704e) to head (d06a16a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5134   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.14%   86.14%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines       32489    32489           
=======================================
  Hits        27987    27987           
  Misses       4502     4502           

Flag	Coverage Δ
wasm-lib	86.14% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.