Skip to content

docs(specs): Implementation priority plan from .specs review#327

Draft
glassBead-tc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/specs-implementation-priority-plan-4cb5
Draft

docs(specs): Implementation priority plan from .specs review#327
glassBead-tc wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/specs-implementation-priority-plan-4cb5

Conversation

@glassBead-tc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Adds .specs/IMPLEMENTATION-PRIORITY-PLAN.md — a prioritized implementation roadmap after reviewing the full .specs/ corpus (~171 files).

What it contains

  • Scoring methodology (pain, leverage, readiness, fit)
  • Snapshot of what is already shipped vs spec-only vs stale
  • Seven ranked tracks with reasoning, phases, success criteria, and suggested branch names
  • Dependency-aware sequencing diagram
  • Explicit deferrals (governance research, Letta/DGM, Srcbook vertical, Canonical IR)

Top recommendations

  1. SPEC-SRC-006 — MCP root session recovery (data-loss fix)
  2. SPEC-GW-011 — First-call-only schema embedding + thoughtbox_operations
  3. SPEC-CHX-001 — Harness quick wins (tb.t, mid-session recall, docs)
  4. SPEC-HARNESS-T1 — Plugin primer + interleaved-thinking rewrite
  5. SPEC-EVAL-001 — Operationalize LangSmith datasets + baseline experiment
  6. ADR-022 Part 2 — Peer notebook manifest lifecycle
  7. SPEC-BRANCH-WORKERS — Parallel branch edge workers

Note

Documents a discrepancy: CHANGELOG/README claim OODA loop embedding exists, but scripts/embed-loops.ts and loop resource files are absent from the current tree.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Synthesizes 171 spec files into seven ranked implementation tracks with
reasoning, dependencies, and explicit deferrals. Highlights gaps between
CHANGELOG claims and current tree (OODA loops MCP).

Co-authored-by: glassBead <glassBead-tc@proton.me>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
thoughtbox-web-two Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 3, 2026 5:17am

@supabase

supabase Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project akjccuoncxlvrrtkvtno because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants