Skip to content

WIP: experiment of using cfg options for differing Qt types #926

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

ahayzen-kdab
Copy link
Collaborator

This requires #904 and a CXX patch to work.

@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab force-pushed the 882-qtypes-cfg-versioning branch from db33e5b to 5e8a217 Compare April 17, 2024 10:29
@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab force-pushed the 882-qtypes-cfg-versioning branch from 5e8a217 to eefff66 Compare September 5, 2024 16:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (7e52b94) to head (4b91445).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #926   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           71        71           
  Lines        11928     11928           
=========================================
  Hits         11928     11928           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab force-pushed the 882-qtypes-cfg-versioning branch from eefff66 to 4b91445 Compare September 26, 2024 14:30
@ahayzen-kdab
Copy link
Collaborator Author

this causes duplicate names in CXX, instead this should be handled by having different names in the CXX bridge then a wrapper in Rust to call the right one, or a wrapper in C++ like there is currently. Which means this change is irrelevant other than moving the casting of the type from C++ to Rust which could be done in a separate change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant