Skip to content

trait for bounds checking #321

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

trait for bounds checking #321

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Tokazama
Copy link
Member

This is based predominantly on the work by @timholy in this PR. The plan is to work this into ArrayInterface.jl in another PR, replacing some of #291 and taking advantage of the recent function-index where we know everything is inbounds.

@Tokazama Tokazama requested a review from timholy June 22, 2022 21:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #321 (655f158) into master (b0d818d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #321   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.16%   90.16%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        1342     1342           
=======================================
  Hits         1210     1210           
  Misses        132      132           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b0d818d...655f158. Read the comment docs.

@Tokazama Tokazama mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2022
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Update to the new version?

Tokazama added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2023
@Tokazama
Copy link
Member Author

Superseded by #383

@Tokazama Tokazama closed this Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants