Skip to content

Conversation

@Raghu0703
Copy link

@Raghu0703 Raghu0703 commented Nov 24, 2025

Description

Fixed capitalization typo in README.md heading.

Changes

  • Changed ## contributing to ## Contributing

Fixes #12662

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated capitalization formatting in the Community section of the README.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md received minor capitalization corrections: "## contributing" heading changed to "## Contributing" and "contributors" text updated to "Contributors" for proper formatting consistency.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README Documentation
README.md
Capitalization corrections: heading "## contributing" → "## Contributing" and text "contributors" → "Contributors"

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

You better think twice before wasting more time on this one, friend! Like a wise ol' pigeon dropping wisdom, I'm telling ya—these are purely cosmetic capitalization fixes with zero functional impact. No logic to examine, no dependencies to trace, no edge cases lurking in the shadows. Just straightforward text cleanup. This is the kind of change that gets reviewed faster than a pigeon can snag a breadcrumb! 🐦

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description addresses the fix but lacks required template sections like 'Prepare' checklist, 'Implementation Details', and 'Test and Document' sections. Complete the PR template by including all required sections: Prepare checklist, Implementation Details (if applicable), and Test and Document checklist with appropriate selections.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: capitalizing the 'Contributing' heading in README.md.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully implements the fix outlined in issue #12662: capitalizing the 'Contributing' heading from lowercase to proper case.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The only change is the capitalization of 'contributing' to 'Contributing' in README.md, which is directly aligned with issue #12662 and contains no out-of-scope modifications.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mo-auto
Copy link
Member

mo-auto commented Nov 24, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)

1-142: You better think twice about what this PR actually changes! 🕊️

Like a pigeon that needs clear skies to navigate, I gotta call this one out: I searched the entire README.md for the "## contributing" heading you mentioned in the PR objectives, and it doesn't exist—not anywhere in the file. So that capitalization fix you're claiming? It can't happen if the heading ain't there to begin with!

Here's what I found:

  • Zero matches for any "contributing" or "Contributing" section heading
  • Line 87 shows "Contributors" (already capitalized in the final code)
  • The PR objectives claim fixing issue #12662 with a heading change, but that heading is nowhere to be found

What needs to happen: Clarify what this PR actually changes. Either:

  1. The PR objectives/description don't match the real changes, or
  2. The scope changed and the description wasn't updated

Let's get the vibes straight so we're on the same flight path! 🚀

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6b9f40 and 1098722.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~87-~87: Consider using a more formal and expressive alternative to ‘amazing’.
Context: ... ## Community A BIG thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a divers...

(AWESOME)


[style] ~87-~87: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 21 exclamation marks for a text that’s 11634 characters long)
Context: ...G thanks to all the amazing Contributors!! 👏 👏 Building a diverse and inclusive...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

Copy link
Author

@Raghu0703 Raghu0703 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Typo in README — Incorrect heading capitalization in “Contributing” section

2 participants