Skip to content

Update docstring of xp keyword in dpnp.interp #2506

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 27, 2025

Conversation

antonwolfy
Copy link
Contributor

@antonwolfy antonwolfy commented Jun 27, 2025

The PR adds strict word in the docstring of xp keyword in dpnp.interp following similar change implemented in NumPy.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • Have you added documentation for your changes, if necessary?
  • Have you added your changes to the changelog?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2025

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Array API standard conformance tests for dpnp=0.19.0dev0=py312h509198e_31 ran successfully.
Passed: 1231
Failed: 0
Skipped: 9

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 72.03%. remained the same
when pulling 32d7ba2 on update-interp-docstring
into 78597f9 on master.

@antonwolfy antonwolfy merged commit fc7283b into master Jun 27, 2025
80 of 88 checks passed
@antonwolfy antonwolfy deleted the update-interp-docstring branch June 27, 2025 16:40
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
The PR adds `strict` word in the docstring of `xp` keyword in
`dpnp.interp` following similar change implemented in NumPy. fc7283b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants