Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase the number of scenarii per proof in the CI #30

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2024

Conversation

Baptouuuu
Copy link
Member

In order to better cover conditions based on the types of structures inputs (such as Map changing its implementation depending on the key type). This will allow for the code coverage to be more stable.

@Baptouuuu Baptouuuu added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 9, 2024
@Baptouuuu Baptouuuu self-assigned this Nov 9, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.50%. Comparing base (dfdebfc) to head (790208d).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop      #30      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      97.13%   97.50%   +0.37%     
  Complexity       977      977              
=============================================
  Files             64       64              
  Lines           3488     3488              
=============================================
+ Hits            3388     3401      +13     
+ Misses           100       87      -13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Baptouuuu Baptouuuu merged commit 8a3135d into develop Nov 9, 2024
21 checks passed
@Baptouuuu Baptouuuu deleted the increase-scenarii-per-proof branch November 9, 2024 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant